2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-009-9274-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Compressive Straining on Nanoindentation Elastic Modulus of Trabecular Bone

Abstract: Trabecular bone with its porous structure is an important compressive load bearing member. Different structural factors such as porosity, non-homogeneous deformation, varying trabeculae thickness, connectivity, and nanoscale (10 nm to 1 μm) to macroscale (~0.1 mm to 10 mm) composition hierarchy determine the failure properties of trabecular bone. While the above factors have important bearing on bone properties, an understanding of how the local nanoscale properties change at different macroscale compressive s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a persistence length of ∼18 μm (midway between the lowest and highest projected 3D‐WLC persistence length values) would imply an elastic modulus of 19 GPa for a cylindrical rod with a 1.5 nm diameter, appropriate for collagen. For comparison, recent reports for the elastic modulus of bovine femoral trabecular bone, obtained through nanoindentation experiments, under no macroscopic compressive strain, is ∼20 GPa . The mineralized bone would be expected to be significantly more rigid than the unmineralized collagen molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, a persistence length of ∼18 μm (midway between the lowest and highest projected 3D‐WLC persistence length values) would imply an elastic modulus of 19 GPa for a cylindrical rod with a 1.5 nm diameter, appropriate for collagen. For comparison, recent reports for the elastic modulus of bovine femoral trabecular bone, obtained through nanoindentation experiments, under no macroscopic compressive strain, is ∼20 GPa . The mineralized bone would be expected to be significantly more rigid than the unmineralized collagen molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a standard preparation procedure (Dall'Ara et al, 2012;Gan et al, 2010;Giambini et al, 2012;Rho et al, 1997;Zysset et al, 1999), specimens were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (Branson 5210, Branson Ultrasonics; Danbury CT), dehydrated in a series of alcohol baths followed by air dying, and embedded in low-viscosity epoxy (EpoxySet, Allied High Tech Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA). The embedded specimens were polished with five grades of silicon carbide paper (320-1200 grit) and two grades of polishing slurry (1 mm diamond and 0.05 mm alumina-silica) (Allied High Tech Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA).…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent works have conducted in-depth investigations into the biomechanics of the femur in fracture fixation and into the phenomena of strain shielding [22,23]. The mechanics of trabecular bone, which is of tremendous interest due to its role in osteoporosis, has been investigated using a novel non-destructive method based on micro-computed tomography technology [24] and was also the subject of a nanoscale biomechanical study by Gao et al [25].…”
Section: Musculoskeletal Biomechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%