2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of composition on helium diffusion in fluoroapatites investigated with nuclear reaction analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 that the closure temperature for the random Cl arrangement depends significantly on the Cl-content. The dependence of He-diffusion coefficients on chemical composition in apatite has been rejected by Wolf et al (1998), but more recent analyses (Miro et al, 2006) seem to support our result. Additionally, Min et al (2003) report He-diffusion coefficients for 3.4-3.6 wt.% Cl-apatite grains (i.e., >50% Cl atom), which have retentive values; the closure temperature estimated for the same grain size and cooling rate as used in this study is around 96°C.…”
Section: Impact On the Closure Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 that the closure temperature for the random Cl arrangement depends significantly on the Cl-content. The dependence of He-diffusion coefficients on chemical composition in apatite has been rejected by Wolf et al (1998), but more recent analyses (Miro et al, 2006) seem to support our result. Additionally, Min et al (2003) report He-diffusion coefficients for 3.4-3.6 wt.% Cl-apatite grains (i.e., >50% Cl atom), which have retentive values; the closure temperature estimated for the same grain size and cooling rate as used in this study is around 96°C.…”
Section: Impact On the Closure Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The effect of chemical composition on He diffusion has been scarcely studied so far (Wolf et al, 1998;Miro et al, 2006;Min et al, 2003Min et al, , 2013 but the measurements seem to evidence some differences compared to the standard Durango apatite, especially for marked chemical differences. However, no consensus exists on the impact of chemical composition on He diffusion in apatite (Farley, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were performed at the 4 MeV Dynamitron accelerator at the University at Albany. This nuclear reaction has been used to measure 3 He in a variety of minerals and ceramic materials, including apatite (e.g., Miro et al, 2006;Cherniak et al, 2009), zircon (Cherniak et al, 2009), zirconia (Gosset et al, 2002;Costantini et al, 2003;Trocellier et al, 2003a,b), britholite (Costantini et al, 2002;Gosset et al, 2002;Trocellier et al, 2003a;Gosset and Trocellier, 2005), titanite (Cherniak and Watson, 2011), rutile (Cherniak and Watson, 2011), and garnet (Roselieb et al, 2006). The protons produced in the reaction, along with backscattered deuterons and products of various (d,p) and (d,a) reactions induced with light elements contained in the sample, were detected with a solid state surface barrier detector with 1500 lm depletion depth and 100 mm 2 area positioned at 167.5°with respect to the incident beam.…”
Section: Ion Implantation and Diffusion Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct profiling to characterize diffusion of implanted 3 He and 4 He in a range of phosphates, oxides and silicates has been undertaken using the techniques of nuclear reaction analysis (NRA) and Elastic Recoil Detection (ERD) (e.g., Ouchani et al, 1998;Costantini et al, 2002;Gosset et al, 2002;Trocellier et al, 2003a,b;Miro et al, 2006Miro et al, , 2007Cherniak et al, 2009;Cherniak and Watson, 2011). These investigations complement the findings from bulk release experiments and provide additional constraints on He diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were performed at the 4 MeV Dynamitron accelerator at the University at Albany. This nuclear reaction has been used to measure 3 He in a variety of minerals and ceramic materials (e.g., Gosset et al, 2002;Costantini et al, 2003;Trocellier et al, 2003;Miro et al, 2006;Cherniak et al, 2009;Cherniak and Watson, 2011, 2012. The protons produced in the reaction, along with backscattered deuterons and products of various (d,p) and (d,a) reactions induced with light elements contained in the samples, were detected with a solid state surface barrier detector with 1500 lm depletion depth and 100 mm 2 area positioned at 167.5°with respect to the incident beam.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%