2021
DOI: 10.1149/2162-8777/abe7a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Complexing Agents on Surface Composition for Co Post-CMP Cleaning Process

Abstract: The effect of surface composition change based on complexing agents on cobalt (Co) post-chemical mechanical polishing cleaning (cleaning) is investigated. The change in chemical composition of the Co surface significantly affects Co cleaning performance, as well as dissolution capacity of the complexing agent and pH of cleaning solution. Oxide composition of the Co surface was manipulated using different types of complexing agents. Addition of citric acid and glycine in cleaning solution resulted in predominan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The pH setting of 11 for the CA solution was intended to operate within this domain, enabling the Co(OH) 2 makeup of any adsorbed surface species formed by OH − . The particular pH value of 11 has also been previously used for other CA based alkaline PCMPC solutions of Co 25,26 and Cu. 6 By maintaining the pH of the CA solution close to that of the CMP test slurry, it helped to avoid the introduction of significantly different surface chemistries in going from CMP to PCMPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 The pH setting of 11 for the CA solution was intended to operate within this domain, enabling the Co(OH) 2 makeup of any adsorbed surface species formed by OH − . The particular pH value of 11 has also been previously used for other CA based alkaline PCMPC solutions of Co 25,26 and Cu. 6 By maintaining the pH of the CA solution close to that of the CMP test slurry, it helped to avoid the introduction of significantly different surface chemistries in going from CMP to PCMPC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed solution chemistries, however, varied between the CMP and PCMP cases. 7 The strategy of maintaining mutually similar chemical environment between CMP and PCMPC processes has been used by other authors, 26 and this approach has been helpful for developing analytical PCMPC characterization protocols. 5 In the PCMPC setting, surface coverages of CMP residues should be substantially lower than those of the same species being generated in a CMP solution as primary materials for planarization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical and mechanical planarization (CMP) and post-CMP cleaning technologies are advancing continuously with the decreasing size of the semiconductor integrated circuits and increasing the integration density. [1][2][3][4] During the process of semiconductor manufacturing, a significant amount of residues, such as photoresist, abrasive nanoparticles, and pad debris, are generated and unavoidably deposited on wafer surfaces. These materials, if not properly removed during cleaning, adversely affect the process yield and performances of semiconductor devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%