Abstract:We studied global gene expression in three melanoma cell lines with the most common and potent V600E mutation in the B-RAF gene-four cell lines with a common Q61R mutation in the N-RAS gene and three cell lines with no mutations using human HG-U133A 2.0 micro-arrays with 22 277 transcripts. Data analysis using stringent criteria revealed several upregulated and downregulated genes in cell lines with B-RAF and N-RAS mutations compared with cell lines without mutations. We found 29 genes specifically upregulated… Show more
“…DUSPs are key regulators of the balance between kinase pathway activation and inactivation, and have previously been reported to be upregulated in an adaptive response, creating a negative feedback loop following MAPK pathway activation (Keyse, 2008). Consistent with our own data, DUSP4 expression has previously been shown to be increased in pancreatic tumours with K-Ras mutations (Yip-Schneider et al, 2001) and DUSP6 expression increased in a variety of tumour types with mutations in Ras or Raf pathway genes (Croonquist et al, 2003;Warmka et al, 2004;Bloethner et al, 2005). Of particular interest, however, was our observation that certain signalling cascades, including those mediated by Igf1 and Vegf, were differentially activated by cluster 1 and cluster 2 K-Ras mutants, suggesting that not only the presence but the specific molecular characteristics of individual K-Ras mutations may be important determinants of both tumour progression and treatment response.…”
Background:
Response to
EGFR
-targeted therapies in colorectal cancer patients has been convincingly associated with Kirsten-Ras (
K-Ras
) mutation status. Current mandatory mutation testing for patient selection is limited to the
K-Ras
‘hotspot' codons 12 and 13.
Methods:
Colorectal tumours (
n
=106) were screened for additional
K-Ras
mutations, phenotypes compared in transformation and Ras GTPase activating assays and gene and pathway changes induced by individual
K-Ras
mutants identified by microarray analysis. Taqman-based gene copy number and FISH analyses were used to investigate
K-Ras
gene amplification.
Results:
Four additional
K-Ras
mutations (Leu
19
Phe (1 out of 106 tumours), Lys
117
Asn (1 out of 106), Ala
146
Thr (7 out of 106) and Arg
164
Gln (1 out of 106)) were identified. Lys
117
Asn and Ala
146
Thr had phenotypes similar to the hotspot mutations, whereas Leu
19
Phe had an attenuated phenotype and the Arg
164
Gln mutation was phenotypically equivalent to wt
K-Ras
. We additionally identified a new
K-Ras
gene amplification event, present in approximately 2% of tumours.
Conclusions:
The identification of mutations outwith previously described hotspot codons increases the
K-Ras
mutation burden in colorectal tumours by one-third. Future mutation screening to facilitate optimal patient selection for treatment with
EGFR
-targeted therapies should therefore be extended to codon 146, and in addition should consider the unique molecular signatures associated with individual
K-Ras
mutations.
“…DUSPs are key regulators of the balance between kinase pathway activation and inactivation, and have previously been reported to be upregulated in an adaptive response, creating a negative feedback loop following MAPK pathway activation (Keyse, 2008). Consistent with our own data, DUSP4 expression has previously been shown to be increased in pancreatic tumours with K-Ras mutations (Yip-Schneider et al, 2001) and DUSP6 expression increased in a variety of tumour types with mutations in Ras or Raf pathway genes (Croonquist et al, 2003;Warmka et al, 2004;Bloethner et al, 2005). Of particular interest, however, was our observation that certain signalling cascades, including those mediated by Igf1 and Vegf, were differentially activated by cluster 1 and cluster 2 K-Ras mutants, suggesting that not only the presence but the specific molecular characteristics of individual K-Ras mutations may be important determinants of both tumour progression and treatment response.…”
Background:
Response to
EGFR
-targeted therapies in colorectal cancer patients has been convincingly associated with Kirsten-Ras (
K-Ras
) mutation status. Current mandatory mutation testing for patient selection is limited to the
K-Ras
‘hotspot' codons 12 and 13.
Methods:
Colorectal tumours (
n
=106) were screened for additional
K-Ras
mutations, phenotypes compared in transformation and Ras GTPase activating assays and gene and pathway changes induced by individual
K-Ras
mutants identified by microarray analysis. Taqman-based gene copy number and FISH analyses were used to investigate
K-Ras
gene amplification.
Results:
Four additional
K-Ras
mutations (Leu
19
Phe (1 out of 106 tumours), Lys
117
Asn (1 out of 106), Ala
146
Thr (7 out of 106) and Arg
164
Gln (1 out of 106)) were identified. Lys
117
Asn and Ala
146
Thr had phenotypes similar to the hotspot mutations, whereas Leu
19
Phe had an attenuated phenotype and the Arg
164
Gln mutation was phenotypically equivalent to wt
K-Ras
. We additionally identified a new
K-Ras
gene amplification event, present in approximately 2% of tumours.
Conclusions:
The identification of mutations outwith previously described hotspot codons increases the
K-Ras
mutation burden in colorectal tumours by one-third. Future mutation screening to facilitate optimal patient selection for treatment with
EGFR
-targeted therapies should therefore be extended to codon 146, and in addition should consider the unique molecular signatures associated with individual
K-Ras
mutations.
“…Other oncogenic mutants may require loss of these proteins to effect transformation. In fact, DUSP and SPRY gene expression have been reported to be elevated in V600E BRAF melanomas (36,37), but significantly reduced in a variety of other tumors (38)(39)(40)(41). Evasion of pathway feedback may be a fundamental requirement for oncogenic transformation.…”
“…3B). This included up-regulation of two dual-specificity phosphatases (DUSP4 and -6) that are inhibitors of ERK signaling and were previously shown to be overexpressed in tumor cell lines containing somatic activating mutations in NRAS (20).…”
Section: P58 Has a Gain-of-function Nras Mutationmentioning
The p21 RAS subfamily of small GTPases, including KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS, regulates cell proliferation, cytoskeletal organization, and other signaling networks, and is the most frequent target of activating mutations in cancer. Activating germline mutations of KRAS and HRAS cause severe developmental abnormalities leading to Noonan, cardio-facial-cutaneous, and Costello syndrome, but activating germline mutations of NRAS have not been reported. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is the most common genetic disease of lymphocyte apoptosis and causes autoimmunity as well as excessive lymphocyte accumulation, particularly of CD4 ؊ , CD8 ؊ ␣ T cells. Mutations in ALPS typically affect CD95 (Fas/APO-1)-mediated apoptosis, one of the extrinsic death pathways involving TNF receptor superfamily proteins, but certain ALPS individuals have no such mutations. We show here that the salient features of ALPS as well as a predisposition to hematological malignancies can be caused by a heterozygous germline Gly13Asp activating mutation of the NRAS oncogene that does not impair CD95-mediated apoptosis. The increase in active, GTP-bound NRAS augments RAF/MEK/ERK signaling, which markedly decreases the proapoptotic protein BIM and attenuates intrinsic, nonreceptor-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis. Thus, germline activating mutations in NRAS differ from other p21 Ras oncoproteins by causing selective immune abnormalities without general developmental defects. Our observations on the effects of NRAS activation indicate that RAS-inactivating drugs, such as farnesyltransferase inhibitors should be examined in human autoimmune and lymphocyte homeostasis disorders. autoimmunity ͉ B cell lymphoma 2-interacting mediator of cell death ͉ intrinsic apoptosis ͉ lymphoma ͉ lymphoproliferation
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.