Abstract:A biological trial was undertaken to study the effect of inclusion of graded levels of commercial guar meal (CGM) in diet on the performance and nutrient digestibility in commercial broiler chickens. A total of 350 oneday- old broiler male chicks (Cobb 400) were reared on wire floor electrically heated battery brooders. The chicks were randomly divided into 7 groups. Each treatment had 10 replicates of 5 chicks each. All the groups received iso-nitrogenous and iso-caloric diets. First group was fed maize-SBM; … Show more
“…The share of specific fractions in guar meal is also associated with the content of crude fibre, which is little desired by poultry. The examined guar meal contained nearly twice more (7.78%) fibre than guar beans, in which a low content of fibre (4.1% and 5.13%) was determined by Pathak et al [51] and Rao et al [28]. In contrast, its level was lower (9.3%) than in beans analysed by Ahmed et al [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, compared to the control birds, chickens fed rations with 10% of guar meal were observed to have bigger livers (p ≤ 0.05), while bigger gizzards were characteristic of those receiving feed containing less guar meal (7.5%). Rao et al [28] did not note any significant influence of 6%, 12% and 18% of guar meal added to feed rations for broiler chickens on the dressing percentage, breast yield, giblet weight, abdominal fat and the weight of heart and liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the first week of the experiment, the ambient temperature was 32 • C. Afterwards, it was reduced every seven days by 1-2 • C until it reached about 2 • C in the final week of rearing. The 42-day chicken period was divided into three feeding phases: starter (days 1-21), grower (days [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and finisher (days [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. The feed rations were all in mash form.…”
Section: Experiments Design Birds and Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of a higher content of crude protein, methionine and phosphorus in relation to soybean meal, adding guar meal to poultry feed may be an efficient strategy for cutting down on the feeding cost with no adverse effect on production [25]. However, the use of a high percentage of this source of plant protein in poultry feed is limited due to the observed undesirable effects, including diarrhoea, reduced growth rate, deteriorated productivity and increased mortality rate [26][27][28]. The usage of guar meal in broiler diets limits the level of anti-nutrients such as guar gum (β-mannan), saponins and trypsin inhibitors.…”
This study aimed to evaluate how different percentages of guar meal in feed rations for broiler chickens affect their rearing performance and carcass composition. The experiment was conducted in a group of one hundred sixty Ross 308 broilers randomly allocated to four equinumerous groups (K, G4, G8 and G12). The birds were reared over 42 days with the application of three feeding periods: starter (days 1–21), grower (days 22–35) and finisher (days 36–42). All the feed rations were prepared using maize meal, soybean meal, oil and mineral and vitamin additives. An experimental factor was the share of guar meal in feed rations: group K—0%, G4—4%, G8—8% and G12—12%. It was demonstrated that a higher percentage (8% or 12%) of guar meal in the feed rations had a negative effect on the chickens’ weight gain and feed intake. The birds receiving feed rations supplemented with guar meal featured higher feed conversion levels than those fed rations in which soybean meal was the only protein-rich component (p ≤ 0.05). Birds fed rations with the highest percentage (12%) of guar meal showed a significant decrease in chilled carcass weight and dressing percentage compared with other chickens. A higher percentage (8% or 12%) of guar meal in feed rations had an adverse effect on the birds’ muscularity. In addition, it was demonstrated that their meat was DFD (dark, firm and dry; pH1 > 6.4), but from a dietary point of view, it contained the smallest amount of intramuscular fat. To sum up, 4% of guar meal should be recommended in broiler chicken feeding to ensure their satisfactory rearing performance and carcass composition, including the physico-chemical properties of their muscles.
“…The share of specific fractions in guar meal is also associated with the content of crude fibre, which is little desired by poultry. The examined guar meal contained nearly twice more (7.78%) fibre than guar beans, in which a low content of fibre (4.1% and 5.13%) was determined by Pathak et al [51] and Rao et al [28]. In contrast, its level was lower (9.3%) than in beans analysed by Ahmed et al [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, compared to the control birds, chickens fed rations with 10% of guar meal were observed to have bigger livers (p ≤ 0.05), while bigger gizzards were characteristic of those receiving feed containing less guar meal (7.5%). Rao et al [28] did not note any significant influence of 6%, 12% and 18% of guar meal added to feed rations for broiler chickens on the dressing percentage, breast yield, giblet weight, abdominal fat and the weight of heart and liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the first week of the experiment, the ambient temperature was 32 • C. Afterwards, it was reduced every seven days by 1-2 • C until it reached about 2 • C in the final week of rearing. The 42-day chicken period was divided into three feeding phases: starter (days 1-21), grower (days [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and finisher (days [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. The feed rations were all in mash form.…”
Section: Experiments Design Birds and Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of a higher content of crude protein, methionine and phosphorus in relation to soybean meal, adding guar meal to poultry feed may be an efficient strategy for cutting down on the feeding cost with no adverse effect on production [25]. However, the use of a high percentage of this source of plant protein in poultry feed is limited due to the observed undesirable effects, including diarrhoea, reduced growth rate, deteriorated productivity and increased mortality rate [26][27][28]. The usage of guar meal in broiler diets limits the level of anti-nutrients such as guar gum (β-mannan), saponins and trypsin inhibitors.…”
This study aimed to evaluate how different percentages of guar meal in feed rations for broiler chickens affect their rearing performance and carcass composition. The experiment was conducted in a group of one hundred sixty Ross 308 broilers randomly allocated to four equinumerous groups (K, G4, G8 and G12). The birds were reared over 42 days with the application of three feeding periods: starter (days 1–21), grower (days 22–35) and finisher (days 36–42). All the feed rations were prepared using maize meal, soybean meal, oil and mineral and vitamin additives. An experimental factor was the share of guar meal in feed rations: group K—0%, G4—4%, G8—8% and G12—12%. It was demonstrated that a higher percentage (8% or 12%) of guar meal in the feed rations had a negative effect on the chickens’ weight gain and feed intake. The birds receiving feed rations supplemented with guar meal featured higher feed conversion levels than those fed rations in which soybean meal was the only protein-rich component (p ≤ 0.05). Birds fed rations with the highest percentage (12%) of guar meal showed a significant decrease in chilled carcass weight and dressing percentage compared with other chickens. A higher percentage (8% or 12%) of guar meal in feed rations had an adverse effect on the birds’ muscularity. In addition, it was demonstrated that their meat was DFD (dark, firm and dry; pH1 > 6.4), but from a dietary point of view, it contained the smallest amount of intramuscular fat. To sum up, 4% of guar meal should be recommended in broiler chicken feeding to ensure their satisfactory rearing performance and carcass composition, including the physico-chemical properties of their muscles.
“…Network motif searching has many applications including its use in bioinformatics in identification of genes responsible for diseases in humans and animals and biotic and abiotic stresses in plants etc. Motif detection can be applied for the identification of TFBS using the nucleotide sequences of livestock species (Rao et al 2014), genetic improvement of livestock species, drug discovery etc. Network motifs were defined for the first time as pattern of interconnections occurring in complex networks in numbers that are significantly higher than those in the randomized networks (Milo et al 2002).…”
Network motif search is useful in uncovering the important functional components of complex networks in biological, chemical, social and other domains. PATCOMP - a PARTICIA based novel approach for network motif search is proposed in this paper. The algorithm of PATCOMP takes benefit of memory compression and speed of PATRICIA trie to store the collection of subgraphs in memory and search them for classification and census of network. The structure of trie nodes and how data structure is developed to use it for counting the subgraphs is also described. PATCOMP was compared with QuateXelero and G-Tries.The main benefit of this approach is significant reduction in memory space requirement particularly for large network motifs with acceptable time performance. The experiments with directed networks like E.coli, yeast, social and electronic validated the advantage of PATCOMP in terms of reduction in memory usage by 2.7-27.7% as compared to QuateXelero for smaller motif sizes (with exceptions of s=6 for E. coli and s=6 for social), and 7.8-38.35% for larger motif sizes. For undirected networks, PATCOMP utilizes less memory by 0.07%-43% (with exception of s=7 for electronic and s=6,8 for dolphin networks).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.