2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-015-3450-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of comfort pads and incubator design on neonatal radiography

Abstract: Comfort pads and tray support devices can have a considerable effect on DEE and image quality, with large variations among different incubator designs. Positioning the image detector directly underneath neonatal patients for radiography is a potential means for patient dose reduction. However, such benefit should be weighed against the risks of moving the patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the above methodological differences, there was a wide variation in recorded attenuation values for incubator components ranging from 12%-72%. These values are influenced by methodology differences but also they are influenced by the make and manufacturer of the incubator, however this was difficult to quantify as only two studies specified the type of incubator used 2,5 . In addition, the studies whom provided attenuation values for various different components of incubator design (individual components and combined) calculated the percentage difference or percentage reduction between a direct exposure (without any attenuator) in comparison to exposures with various different incubator component in-between the X-ray tube and image receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Owing to the above methodological differences, there was a wide variation in recorded attenuation values for incubator components ranging from 12%-72%. These values are influenced by methodology differences but also they are influenced by the make and manufacturer of the incubator, however this was difficult to quantify as only two studies specified the type of incubator used 2,5 . In addition, the studies whom provided attenuation values for various different components of incubator design (individual components and combined) calculated the percentage difference or percentage reduction between a direct exposure (without any attenuator) in comparison to exposures with various different incubator component in-between the X-ray tube and image receptor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al 2 on the other hand used an objective measure of image quality which was contrast to noise ratio (CNR). CNR has been used successfully as a measure of image quality in various optimisation studies [14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations