2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cold rolling on recrystallization and tensile behavior of a high-Mn steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
36
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield strength ( σ 0.2 ) is commonly related to the grain size ( D ) through Hall–Petch type relationship as shown in Figure a for the present steels along with other results for hot‐rolled high‐Mn steels . The yield strength of hot‐rolled steels can roughly be expressed as σ 0.2 = 200 + 300 D −0.5 in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The yield strength ( σ 0.2 ) is commonly related to the grain size ( D ) through Hall–Petch type relationship as shown in Figure a for the present steels along with other results for hot‐rolled high‐Mn steels . The yield strength of hot‐rolled steels can roughly be expressed as σ 0.2 = 200 + 300 D −0.5 in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The values of σ 0 = 160 MPa and k y = 355 MPa µm 0.5 are obtained in the present study. Note here, almost the same σ 0 and k y have been reported in other papers on austenitic steels [13,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is clearly seen that the dislocation strengthening can be expressed by Equation (4) with α = 0.6. The value of α has been reported varying from about 0.2 to 0.5 [14,15,24,[30][31][32]. Relatively large α = 0.6 obtained for the present work hardened steel samples may be attributed to an enhanced efficiency of dislocation strengthening in high-Mn austenitic steels with low SFE as well as to somewhat underestimated dislocation density by the KAM values, which are actually associated with excess dislocations of similar Burgers vectors rather than total dislocation density [33].…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The least square method formally predicts the best fit of Eq. (4) 7,19,37,46) and 0.2-0.7 MPa m 0.5 for ferrite. 49) In the latter case, the maximal value of strengthening coefficient corresponds to upper saturation limit for steels with large interstitial content.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…7,19,32,43-46) For instance, K = 0.435 MPa 46) and concurrent grain size and dislocation strengthening of work hardened austenite, 45) respectively. As a result, the strength contribution from dislocation strengthening was apparently much larger than that from grain size strengthening.…”
Section: (4)mentioning
confidence: 99%