2016
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/29/7/075004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cold isostatic pressing on the transport current of filamentary MgB2wire made by the IMD process

Abstract: This work describes the effect of cold isostatic pressing applied to as-drawn filamentary wires in a GlidCop and/or Cu sheath made by the internal magnesium diffusion process. Critical currents of as-drawn and isostatically pressed wires at high pressures up to 2.0 GPa followed by heat treatment at 640 °C for 40 min were measured. The obtained results show an improvement in boron powder density resulting in an increase of the critical current of MgB2 layers. The engineering current density increases by 4–13 ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the present six-core wire exposed to cold isostatic pressing up to 2 GPa, the R(T) characteristics have shown only a slight, but systematic, decrease in T c with applied pressure (from 36.8 to 36.6 K in the rolled wire, and from 36.1 to 35.7 K in the drawn one). We observed a similar effect for the GlidCop sheathed multicore wire subjected to the same pressures, where T c =36.8 K of unpressed wire was reduced to 36.2 K (by 0.6 K) after 2 GPa isostatic pressing [15]. The T c decrease by applied isostatic pressure is attributed to a residual strain acting on MgB 2 formation, where the residual strain increases with the degree of applied pressure.…”
Section: Critical Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the present six-core wire exposed to cold isostatic pressing up to 2 GPa, the R(T) characteristics have shown only a slight, but systematic, decrease in T c with applied pressure (from 36.8 to 36.6 K in the rolled wire, and from 36.1 to 35.7 K in the drawn one). We observed a similar effect for the GlidCop sheathed multicore wire subjected to the same pressures, where T c =36.8 K of unpressed wire was reduced to 36.2 K (by 0.6 K) after 2 GPa isostatic pressing [15]. The T c decrease by applied isostatic pressure is attributed to a residual strain acting on MgB 2 formation, where the residual strain increases with the degree of applied pressure.…”
Section: Critical Temperaturesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…While cold pressing with p=2 GPa improved the J e of as-drawn wire with an Al+Al 2 O 3 sheath by 3.38 times, only a 1.55 times J e improvement was reached for the more dense as-rolled wire densified by the same pressure. The presented results are compared with similar experiments done for multi-core IMD wires in figure 6, where the ratios J e(2GPa) /J e(0) =11.4 and 4.17 have been obtained for Cu and GlidCop outer sheaths, respectively [15].…”
Section: Critical Currentsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several factors that may control the formation rate of the MgB 2 layer: (i) annealing parameters (temperature/ time) [7], (ii) morphology of the B powder [9] (iii) thickness of the B layer [10] and also (iv) density of the B layer prior to MgB 2 phase formation [11]. Usually, MgB 2 wires made by IMD process are finally heat treated at temperatures close to the melting point of magnesium for one or several hours [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ MgB2 in the fabrication of superconductor wires has preferred due to the benefit as possible heat treatment at low temperature, comfortable doping, control of particle size, and high critical current density under applied external magnetic field [21]. Additionally, there are various parameters that may control and affect the formation rate of the MgB2 layer as annealing temperature and time [22], cooling and heating rate [23,24], morphology of the B powder [25] thickness of the B layer [26] and also density of the B layer [27]. The factors affecting Jc performance are weak inter-grain connectivity, porosity, and low MgB2 core density [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%