2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cobalt doping on crystallinity, stability, magnetic and optical properties of magnetic iron oxide nano-particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The band gap energy of the prepared nanoparticles varied with an inverse relationship with their sizes. This is similar to what has been reported in previous studies [43].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The band gap energy of the prepared nanoparticles varied with an inverse relationship with their sizes. This is similar to what has been reported in previous studies [43].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…41 Fantechi et al, 42 for instance, showed that the doping of iron oxide MNPs with cobalt resulted in significant increases in the coercive fields and remanent magnetizations, not observing an important effect over the saturation magnetizations. Sathya et al, 43 Anjum et al, 44 or Blanco-Gutieŕrez et al 45 reported similar influence of cobalt doping over the magnetic properties of iron oxide-based MNPs. In other works, Gabal et al 46 and Noh et al 47 have shown that the doping of iron oxide MNPs with zinc in a specific range can lead to a high increase in the saturation magnetizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“… 13–18 This trend was expected even considering potential residual stress in the nanomaterials caused by gradual partial substitution of Fe 2+ species in the octahedral B sites of magnetite that possess an ionic radius (0.77 Å) by Co 2+ species with a smaller ionic radius (0.74 Å) as the lattice parameters were quite similar for magnetite (8.3963 Å) and cobalt ferrite (8.3919 Å). 13 It should be noted that, according to the literature, 17–19 several aspects ( e.g. , amorphous phases and nanoparticle size) can interfere in the resolution of XRD patterns and, therefore, on the precision of Scherrer's equation for directly measuring the average crystalline size of nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%