1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0601m.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of co‐activation of tongue protrudor and retractor muscles on tongue movements and pharyngeal airflow mechanics in the rat

Abstract: Electromyographic recordings in animal models indicate that tongue protrudor (genioglossus, GG) and retractor muscles (styloglossus, SG; hyoglossus, HG) are co-activated during inspiration (Yasui et al. 1993, Fregosi & Fuller, 1997. Moreover, recent experiments indicate that respiratory-related co-activation of protrudor and retractor muscles results in retraction of the tongue (Fregosi & Fuller, 1997;Fuller et al. 1998). The observation that tongue muscle co-activation causes retraction of the tongue implies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
171
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
13
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During exercise and hypercapnia, increased ventilation was associated with a progressive rise in GG EMG activity during both oral and nasal routes of breathing (21,73,88). Furthermore, activation of the GG muscle, either through hypoglossal stimulation or direct muscle stimulation, dilates the oropharynx to increase inspiratory flow rates and thus improves upper airway flow mechanics, specifically within the pharynx (16,19,23,70). Although we did not assess GG muscle activation or inspiratory flow rates during treadmill running, our results, because of alterations in muscle contractile and biochemical properties, suggest that the GG was activated and played a role to improve respiratory mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During exercise and hypercapnia, increased ventilation was associated with a progressive rise in GG EMG activity during both oral and nasal routes of breathing (21,73,88). Furthermore, activation of the GG muscle, either through hypoglossal stimulation or direct muscle stimulation, dilates the oropharynx to increase inspiratory flow rates and thus improves upper airway flow mechanics, specifically within the pharynx (16,19,23,70). Although we did not assess GG muscle activation or inspiratory flow rates during treadmill running, our results, because of alterations in muscle contractile and biochemical properties, suggest that the GG was activated and played a role to improve respiratory mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For swallowing actions, the tongue is active in bolus formation, transport, and propulsion (82). The genioglossus (GG) muscle, the primary tongue protrusor, is a major force generator during the swallow and is crucial to dilation and/or narrowing of the pharynx during breathing (19,21,23). More specifically, the GG is involved in opening the oropharynx and reducing resistance to breathing (57,70,77).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise positional lingual movements, typically thought to involve mainly the protrusion-retrusion axis, likely involve simultaneous deformation of tongue shape in three dimensions, including synchronized lengthening and shortening of different regions (Hiiemae and Crompton, 1985;Fuller et al, 1999), contrary to the prevailing model of simple protrusion-retrusion. The muscular hydrostat model (Kier and Smith, 1985), in linking positional and shape changes (e.g., protrusion accompanying reduced cross-sectional area), provides a more realistic conceptual approach.…”
Section: Ancestral Mammalian Hyolingual Anatomymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Rather, peak flow was achieved at lower stimulation amplitudes in the non-flow-limited group, suggesting enhanced mechanical effects of lingual muscle contraction on the pharynx. This effect could reflect greater linkage between the tongue and other pharyngeal structures, because of differences in lingual muscle fiber orientation, lingual-palatine linkage, or pharyngeal site of collapse (14,28,29). Alternatively, lingual muscle recruitment patterns could differ among patients, as suggested by observed decreases in inspiratory airflow in one patient at stimulation amplitudes well above the peak flow threshold, which were also associated with tongue retraction during wakefulness and sedation.…”
Section: Flow-response Curve Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%