2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2019.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of choosing theQα-values and daughter density distributions on the magic numbers predicted byα

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually it is observed that the predicted magic numbers vary with the method used to calculate the Q-value. In 2019, M. Ismail et al [68], showed that the Q-values calculated from the finite-range droplet model predicted neutron magic numbers of 164, 170, 174, 180, 184 and 198, those based on the Weizsäcker-Skyrme model (WS4) indicated different neutron magic numbers of 172, 178, 184 and 196.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually it is observed that the predicted magic numbers vary with the method used to calculate the Q-value. In 2019, M. Ismail et al [68], showed that the Q-values calculated from the finite-range droplet model predicted neutron magic numbers of 164, 170, 174, 180, 184 and 198, those based on the Weizsäcker-Skyrme model (WS4) indicated different neutron magic numbers of 172, 178, 184 and 196.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the effects of shell structure at N = 126 on the dwell times of the tunneling α-cluster is also discussed by reference The neutron number N = 184 is predicted as a magic number after N = 126 and a deeper valley of α-decay half-lives comes into sight because of the corresponding daughter nuclei with a more stable closed shell structure. In reference [80], a magic number of N = 184 is also raised by comparing various models. Semi-magic number is hard to determine because with the increase mass numbers of the nuclei, in addition to the differences in between the models themselves, the stability of these heavy or SHN also plays a part.…”
Section: The Validation Of Magic Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chinese Physics C Vol. 44 tracted from the WS4 model [51]. Columns (4-7) present the -decay half-lives calculated using Royer's formula, the UDL, the GLDM with shell correction, and the GLDM with shell correction and CFM , respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods provide a very good description of the tunnelling of the -particle across the Coulomb barrier for heavy and super heavy nuclei. While it is difficult to describe -decay in a fully microscopic way, many works have considered microscopic modifications in the -decay calculations [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%