2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of chitosan on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation using the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
18
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
18
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that chitosan had a tendency to decrease IVDMD; however, this was significantly decreased only in the high forage diet. A reduction of in vitro digestibility for maize silage diet and a different forage-concentrate diet with chitosan (325, 750, and 1500 mg/L of culture fluid) has also been observed previously (3)(4)(5). A slight decrease in the digestibility in sheep given chitosan (136 mg/kg of BW) daily via rumen fistula has also been reported (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show that chitosan had a tendency to decrease IVDMD; however, this was significantly decreased only in the high forage diet. A reduction of in vitro digestibility for maize silage diet and a different forage-concentrate diet with chitosan (325, 750, and 1500 mg/L of culture fluid) has also been observed previously (3)(4)(5). A slight decrease in the digestibility in sheep given chitosan (136 mg/kg of BW) daily via rumen fistula has also been reported (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although the negative effects of chitosan on the rumen ciliate protozoa population could be useful, such effects on rumen bacteria, with the consequent decrease in dry matter digestibility, would be harmful. The use of chitosan in ruminant diets influences rumen fermentation processes both in vitro and in vivo (3)(4)(5)(6), and it can also inhibit in vitro rumen biohydrogenation when fat sources are included (7). Rumen ciliate protozoa play an important role in increasing the concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (cis9, trans11C 18:2 ; c9, t11-CLA) and trans-vaccenic acid (trans11C 18:1 ; TVA) in the rumen fluid (8,9), and their alteration by chitosan or by a combination of both additives (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed a linear increase in DM and NDF digestibility with chitosan addition in the rumen without effect on DMI (7% increase from diets Q0 to Q150), probably related to altered ruminal fermentation. However, Goiri et al (2009b) showed in vitro conditions that chitosan lowered NDF digestibility. In a study with sheep, chitosan tended to decrease NDF digestibility but without reducing OM digestibility (Goiri et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The antimicrobial activity of chitosan has emerged as one of its most interesting properties (Matsuhashi & Kume, 1997), which has led to evaluation of its use in ruminant nutrition. Benefits observed seem to be caused by changes in ruminal fermentation, in particular by increased propionate proportion (Goiri et al, 2010) and decreased methane production (Goiri et al, 2009), which in turn lead to energetically more efficient fermentation patterns. Such shifts in the fermentation pattern could result in increased plasma glucose concentrations (Sauer et al, 1989) and as a consequence in improved productive performance or improved efficiency (McGuffey et al, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%