2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02756200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of chitosan derivatives on the reproduction of coliphages T2 and T7

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They found increasing inhibition of the virus with increasing concentrations and complete inhibition was obtained at 0.01 % level. A study with coliphages showed that increases in chitosan, chitosan acetate, and chitosan hydrochloride concentrations from 0.00005 to 0.01 % caused an increase in inhibition of infection from \50 to 100 % against bacteriophage T2 and T7 (Kochkina and Chirkov 2000). Su et al (2009) also found that an increase in chitosan concentration from 0.175 to 0.7 % caused a significant increase in the reduction of FCV-F9 from 1.09 to 2.83 log PFU/mL by 53 kDa chitosan, and 0.44 to 1.44 log PFU/mL by 5 kDa chitosan.…”
Section: Effect Of Chitosan Concentration On Phi X174mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found increasing inhibition of the virus with increasing concentrations and complete inhibition was obtained at 0.01 % level. A study with coliphages showed that increases in chitosan, chitosan acetate, and chitosan hydrochloride concentrations from 0.00005 to 0.01 % caused an increase in inhibition of infection from \50 to 100 % against bacteriophage T2 and T7 (Kochkina and Chirkov 2000). Su et al (2009) also found that an increase in chitosan concentration from 0.175 to 0.7 % caused a significant increase in the reduction of FCV-F9 from 1.09 to 2.83 log PFU/mL by 53 kDa chitosan, and 0.44 to 1.44 log PFU/mL by 5 kDa chitosan.…”
Section: Effect Of Chitosan Concentration On Phi X174mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous study (Davis et al 2012), the mechanism of antiviral activity of chitosan was proposed along with reports of chitosan's ability to inactivate bacteriophages by binding to the negative charge of the viral capsid proteins causing viral structural damage, loss of tail fibers, and viral sheath damage, thereby exposing DNA, (Kochkina et al 2000;Su et al 2009), inhibiting infection (Kochkina et al 1995), and also replication (Chirkov 2002;Kochkina et al 2000). Chitosan is reported to penetrate the plant cell to induce resistance and thus exhibits indirect antiviral activity (Kulikov et al 2006).…”
Section: Effect Of Chitosan Concentration On Phi X174mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lower DP and higher concentration had the best results whereas, in contrast, degree of deamination was not related to the inhibition property. Overall, low DP, high concentration, and deamination provided the best yield for Phage infection inhibitions, but it was speculated that inhibition was caused due to the antibacterial property of chitosan [ 45 ]. For phage viruses like MS2 and phi X 174, Davis et al, demonstrated the remarkable decrease in phage infection at different concentrations and molecular weights of chitosan for each of the phages in support of previous studies done before to emphasize the fact that overall charge on viral surface glycoproteins and charge on chitosan polymer affect the antiviral efficacy of chitosan.…”
Section: Chitosan and Its Derivatives In The Battleground Defeating mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyonik kitosan türevlerinin antiviral etkilerinin düşük ve deasetilasyon derecesi yüksek kitosanların antiviral etkilerinin de yüksek olması kitosanın yapısında bulunan pozitif yüklü grupların antiviral aktiviteden sorumlu olduğunu göstermektedir [56]. Ayrıca % 50 deamine edilmiş kitosan türevlerinin antiviral etkilerini kaybetmeleri de pozitif yüklerin antiviral aktivite için önemini bir kez daha ortaya koymuştur [23].…”
Section: Antiviral Mekanizmaunclassified