2016
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of childhood maltreatment and brain-derived neurotrophic factor on brain morphology

Abstract: Childhood maltreatment (CM) has been associated with altered brain morphology, which may partly be due to a direct impact on neural growth, e.g. through the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) pathway. Findings on CM, BDNF and brain volume are inconsistent and have never accounted for the entire BDNF pathway. We examined the effects of CM, BDNF (genotype, gene expression and protein level) and their interactions on hippocampus, amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) morphology. Data were collected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with prior studies showing a negative correlation between childhood trauma and amygdala volume (54,56,57). However, the relationship between PTSD and amygdala volume was not even nominally significant in the subsample with available childhood trauma information, so we could not evaluate childhood trauma effects on the negative association between amygdala volume and PTSD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in line with prior studies showing a negative correlation between childhood trauma and amygdala volume (54,56,57). However, the relationship between PTSD and amygdala volume was not even nominally significant in the subsample with available childhood trauma information, so we could not evaluate childhood trauma effects on the negative association between amygdala volume and PTSD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Animal models suggest that prolonged stress during sensitive developmental periods detrimentally impacts dendritic growth in limbic and prefrontal regions (Radley et al 2008;Yang et al 2015) that could partially explain lower volumes observed on the macro-anatomic level (Brunson et al 2005;Ivy AS et al 2010;Molet et al 2015). The few previous studies that examined whether polymorphisms modulate the impact of ELS on brain structure in humans observed that specific allelic variants coding brain-derived neurotrophic growth factor and oxytocinergic pathways pathway genes exhibit pronounced volumetric decreases following ELS (Dannlowski et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016). These results in accordance with the diathesis-stress perspective, have been interpreted as genetic vulnerability factors in partially mediating aversive environmental influences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Initial studies that combined a candidate gene approach with neuroimaging reported that specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes associated with neuroplasticity and stress reactivity, including brain derived neurotrophic factor, glucocorticoid and oxytocin receptor sensitivity, confer greater sensitivity to the detrimental impact of ELS, e.g. pronounced reductions of limbic volumes (Dannlowski et al 2016;Tozzi et al 2016;van Velzen et al 2016). Interestingly, two initial studies reported that specific allelic combinations associated with differences in central dopamine and serotonergic functioning exhibited ELS-associated changes in hippocampal and amygdala activation that may reflect improved threat learning and implicit emotion regulation following early aversive experiences (Hermann et al 2012;van Rooij et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines and glucocorticoid systems have each been associated with structural changes in brain regions crucial for emotion regulation and stress response (i.e. lower PFC and hippocampal volumes and larger amygdala volumes (Andrea Danese & McEwen, 2012;Davidson, 2002;Etkin, Egner, & Kalisch, 2011;Gunnar & Quevedo, 2007;Sonia J Lupien, McEwen, Gunnar, & Heim, 2009;Bruce S McEwen, 2005;Numakawa et al, 2014;van Velzen et al, 2016). These regions are also implicated in neuroimaging studies of CM that utilized Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to investigate CM-related brain structures.…”
Section: Brain Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have focused on the effects of single genetic variations on resilience after CM (e.g. (Carballedo et al, 2013;Frodl et al, 2014;Molendijk et al, 2012;van Velzen et al, 2016), 5-HTT-LPR SLC6A4 (Frodl, Reinhold, Koutsouleris, Donohoe, et al, 2010; N. D. Walsh et al, 2012), NPY (Opmeer et al, 2013)), Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) (Caspi et al, 2002;Kim-Cohen et al, 2006;Weder et al, 2009) or the FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP-5) (Klengel et al, 2013) (Table 1). Although these studies support the relevance of specific resilience haplotypes, they must be viewed as preliminary, because they require replication in larger samples and the field suffers from publication bias towards positive results (Duncan & Keller, 2011;Molendijk et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Role Of Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%