2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-230x-11-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of childbirth on the course of Crohn's disease; results from a retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands

Abstract: BackgroundPregnant women with Crohn's disease needs proper counselling about the effect of pregnancy and childbirth on their disease. However, Literature about the effect of childbirth on Crohn's disease is limited. This study examined the effect of childbirth on the course of Crohn's disease and especially perianal Crohn's disease.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study which was performed in a tertiary level referral hospital in the Netherlands. From the IBD database, female patients aged 18-80 years in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Smink et al . from the Netherlands identified no increase in risk of progression to perianal involvement in CD patients without perianal disease prior to pregnancy for vaginal compared with CS delivery (5% vs. 14%, p=NS) 26 . We have recently described that vaginal delivery may be safe in women with perianal disease and not associated with short-term increase in risk of complications, albeit acknowledging a selection bias in women trialing a vaginal birth 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, Smink et al . from the Netherlands identified no increase in risk of progression to perianal involvement in CD patients without perianal disease prior to pregnancy for vaginal compared with CS delivery (5% vs. 14%, p=NS) 26 . We have recently described that vaginal delivery may be safe in women with perianal disease and not associated with short-term increase in risk of complications, albeit acknowledging a selection bias in women trialing a vaginal birth 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, few have examined the effect of mode of delivery on subsequent course of CD, particularly with reference to those with established perianal disease who represent a subgroup with potentially the greatest impact from this decision 13-17 . In this study from two large tertiary referral centers, we sought to address whether pregnancy or mode of delivery would affect likelihood of flare of perianal disease after pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current practice is to pursue vaginal delivery if patients have quiescent disease, encourage Cesarean sections for patients with active perianal disease, and avoid episiotomies if possible. However, the literature in this field is largely limited 13-17 . Thus, there is an important unmet need for continued examination of the impact of mode of delivery on outcomes of patients with established perianal CD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Episiotomy, if obstetrically possible to avoid, is not recommended for IBD patients due to risk of perianal complications; however, it is still preferred to uncontrolled obstetric perineal injury (7,20). Vaginal delivery in IBD patients is not associated with an increased risk of perianal disease compared to CS (7,22,23). The study presented in this paper did not show a statistically signifi cant difference in the incidence of obstetric perineal injury and the frequency of episiotomy across our study groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%