1965
DOI: 10.2307/3276175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Chicken Antiserum and Tissue Extracts on the Oocysts, Sporozoites, and Merozoites of Eimeria tenella and E. acervulina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With cecal contents some complement-mediated, lethal effects were manifested by the increased uptake of trypan blue staining. This is assumed to be an intermediate stage in sporozoite lysis, as has been described, mediated by serum antibodies together with complement [2,4,9,13; 301, seen in the present results with serum as a deformation or stumping of sporozoites associated with trypan blue staining. This is evidence that under conditions of high gut permeability, complement may be present and functionally active together with IgG in the gut lumen.…”
Section: ++ -++supporting
confidence: 80%
“…With cecal contents some complement-mediated, lethal effects were manifested by the increased uptake of trypan blue staining. This is assumed to be an intermediate stage in sporozoite lysis, as has been described, mediated by serum antibodies together with complement [2,4,9,13; 301, seen in the present results with serum as a deformation or stumping of sporozoites associated with trypan blue staining. This is evidence that under conditions of high gut permeability, complement may be present and functionally active together with IgG in the gut lumen.…”
Section: ++ -++supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Although the interaction of sporozoites of chicken coccidia with antibodies from various sources has been documented extensively, it is surprising that agglutination of sporozoites by immune sera has not been reported. However, sporozoite lysis (Long, Rose & Pierce 1963, Burns & Challey 1965, Speer, Wong & Schenkel 1983 immobiliza-tion (Herlich 1965) surface changes (Witlock & Danforth 1982, Speer et al 1985 and neutralization in uitro (Long & Rose 1972, Davis, Parry & Porter 1978, Danforth 1983 and in uiuo (Long et a1 1963, Herlich 1965, Rose 1974, Crane, Gnozzio & Murray 1985 have been observed. Since few quantitative techniques were used in sporozoite studies the biological significance of anti-sporozoite antibodies remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effector mechanism(s) of protective immunity induced by live infection or by extract vaccine remains unclear, however. Although antibodies from various sources demonstrate a variety of antiparasitic activities, including sporozoite immobilization (9), sporozoite and merozoite agglutination and lysis (2,14), neutralization (1,2,9,14,15,22), and surface changes (31), the role of serum antibody in protective immunity is unclear (11,18,(23)(24)(25)28). Recently, emphasis has been directed towards cell-mediated effectors (11,24,25) or secretory antibody (immunoglobulin A [IgA]), which has been shown to neutralize sporozoites both in vitro and in vivo (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%