2002
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.00242702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of chest wall vibration on the canine diaphragm during breathing

Abstract: Effect of chest wall vibration on the canine diaphragm during breathing. D. Leduc, A. De Troyer. #ERS Journals Ltd 2002. ABSTRACT: High-frequency mechanical vibration of the ribcage reduces dyspnoea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the suggestion has been made that this effect might be related to a decrease in central respiratory drive resulting from an increase in afferent inputs from intercostal muscles. In the present studies, the effects of ribcage vibration on central respirator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally inspiratory-only vibration induced augmentation in peak inspired Xow whereas inspiratory-only resistance suppressed peak inspired airXow. Results from Gandevia and McCloskey (1976) and Colebatch et al (1977) are similar to our results and may relate to the fact that they used a cushion-type vibration stimulus on the chest that provides non-selective vibration stimulation rather than the focally applied vibration more commonly used (Jammes et al 2000;Leduc et al 2001;Leduc and De Troyer 2002;Leduc and De Troyer 2003). Gandevia and McCloskey (1976) attributed their Wndings to intercostal muscle spindle activation via supraspinal reXex loops rather than non-speciWc stimulation of inspiratory and expiratory muscle receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally inspiratory-only vibration induced augmentation in peak inspired Xow whereas inspiratory-only resistance suppressed peak inspired airXow. Results from Gandevia and McCloskey (1976) and Colebatch et al (1977) are similar to our results and may relate to the fact that they used a cushion-type vibration stimulus on the chest that provides non-selective vibration stimulation rather than the focally applied vibration more commonly used (Jammes et al 2000;Leduc et al 2001;Leduc and De Troyer 2002;Leduc and De Troyer 2003). Gandevia and McCloskey (1976) attributed their Wndings to intercostal muscle spindle activation via supraspinal reXex loops rather than non-speciWc stimulation of inspiratory and expiratory muscle receptors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, where external intercostal activity was recorded during expiratory phase vibration, no eVect of vibration was observed (Leduc and De Troyer 2002). These Wndings could be due to species diVerences but also to the fact that the dogs used in Leduc's experiments were unconscious whilst our subjects were awake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These afferents act segmentally (4,5) and at the level of the cortex (13) to drive appropriate EI muscle activity to maintain ventilatory homeostasis. Modulation from reflex pathways between intercostal segments (27) and those involving phrenic and intercostal systems (6,36) further ensure that EI muscle activity is modulated on a breath-by-breath basis. The results from the present study do not allow the evaluation of influences from each of these afferent mechanisms on these conscious animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These afferents act segmentally at the spinal cord level and on medullary inspiratory neurons to inhibit inspiratory activity (4,5), and at the level of the cortex (13) may modulate intercostal muscle activity. Reflex connections between thoracic spinal segments (27) involving phrenic and intercostal motor neuronal systems (6,36) have also been identified. Thus intercostal muscle activity is modulated via respiratory muscle afferent feedback on a breath-by-breath basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afferent activation of intercostal muscles by vibratory stimulation in humans does not affect dyspnea induced by hypercapnic stimulation, but reduces dyspnea without changes in motor output, when hypercapnic stimulation is associated with inspiratory load (19). Likewise, vibration does not affect the activity of phrenic or medullary neurons in the experimental animal (13,32). These data suggest that cortical drive and dyspnea perception do not necessarily parallel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%