1987
DOI: 10.1002/asna.2113080504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of changes in magnitudes of QSOs in their redshift distribution

Abstract: Strong emission lines may change the brightness of QSOs and hence their observed magnitudes. Since different lines will affect the magnitudes by entering a particular filter at different redshifts. this effect may alter the number of QSOs at a particular redshift and hence the redshift distribution. The present analysis shows that the influence of the emission lines on the U and B magnitudes are significantly correlated to the redshift distribution. I t is concluded that the changes in observed magnitudes of Q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is associated with the determination of redshift and is completely independant of the way the object is chosen. It is thus not an optical effect (Depaquit et al 1985;Arp et al 1990) that cannot affect redshift measurement of quasars chosen on non-optical basis.A second selection effect also known to influence quasar redshift distribution is the change of observed magnitude and hence brightness of the object as emission lines enter different observing filters resulting in brighter quasars being more easily discovered (Basu, 1987). The effect of emission lines on the U filter is the change in the U magnitude of QSOs (U L ), measured as the number of lines (counted with 'weights' between 0 and 2, values of Basu 1973a), lying in the range of the U-filter, for certain redshift values.We were therefore prompted to investigate whether the periodicity found by Arp et al (1990) is real over the entire redshift domain or have appeared as a result of any of the selection effects mentioned above, at least over some part of the redshift domain.Following Arp et al (1990), we considered z < 1.3 as low redshift domain and z ≥ 1.3 as the high redshift domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is associated with the determination of redshift and is completely independant of the way the object is chosen. It is thus not an optical effect (Depaquit et al 1985;Arp et al 1990) that cannot affect redshift measurement of quasars chosen on non-optical basis.A second selection effect also known to influence quasar redshift distribution is the change of observed magnitude and hence brightness of the object as emission lines enter different observing filters resulting in brighter quasars being more easily discovered (Basu, 1987). The effect of emission lines on the U filter is the change in the U magnitude of QSOs (U L ), measured as the number of lines (counted with 'weights' between 0 and 2, values of Basu 1973a), lying in the range of the U-filter, for certain redshift values.We were therefore prompted to investigate whether the periodicity found by Arp et al (1990) is real over the entire redshift domain or have appeared as a result of any of the selection effects mentioned above, at least over some part of the redshift domain.Following Arp et al (1990), we considered z < 1.3 as low redshift domain and z ≥ 1.3 as the high redshift domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is associated with the determination of redshift and is completely independant of the way the object is chosen. It is thus not an optical effect (Depaquit et al 1985;Arp et al 1990) that cannot affect redshift measurement of quasars chosen on non-optical basis.A second selection effect also known to influence quasar redshift distribution is the change of observed magnitude and hence brightness of the object as emission lines enter different observing filters resulting in brighter quasars being more easily discovered (Basu, 1987). The effect of emission lines on the U filter is the change in the U magnitude of QSOs (U L ), measured as the number of lines (counted with 'weights' between 0 and 2, values of Basu 1973a), lying in the range of the U-filter, for certain redshift values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second selection effect also known to influence quasar redshift distribution is the change of observed magnitude and hence brightness of the object as emission lines enter different observing filters resulting in brighter quasars being more easily discovered (Basu, 1987). The effect of emission lines on the U filter is the change in the U magnitude of QSOs (U L ), measured as the number of lines (counted with 'weights' between 0 and 2, values of Basu 1973a), lying in the range of the U-filter, for certain redshift values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation