Peaks at high redshifts in individual samples of quasars can be explained as due to selection effects. It is concluded that peaks in quasar redshift distribution do not obey any general formula that can constitute a periodicity, even though individual samples may favour some redshifts of smaller values, viz. z < 1.Periodicities in emission line redshift (z) distribution of quasars have been suggested since shortly after the quasar discovery (Burbidge and Burbidge 1967), and subsequently by others (Cowan, 1969;Lake and Roeder, 1972;Burbidge and O'Dell, 1972;Karlsson 1977). Recently, Arp et al. (1990) have demonstrated that preferred redshifts in the form of observed peaks which obey the formula ∆ln(1+z) = 0.206, is exhibited by several individual samples of quasars. These samples for emission line redshifts are (i) multiple quasars around low redshift galaxies (sample X), (ii) radio selected quasars in the 0 h region (sample A) and in the 12 h region (sample B), and combination of samples (A+B), (iii) quasars of large redshifts, viz. z ≥ 1.3, V < 18, in the 0 h region (sample C) and in the 12 h region (sample D).On the other hand, peaks and troughs in emission line redshift distribution of quasars, which actually constitute a periodicity, have been shown to be due to various selection effects by many researchers (Basu). It is also known that an extragalactic object is recognized as a quasar only when its redshift has been determined, whatsoever way it might have been originally chosen, viz. radio, optical, uv excess, x-ray, etc. If there is any 'effect' that influences the determination of redshift, this will certainly affect the redshift distribution -its peaks and troughs and hence any periodicity.The 'availability of search lines' (A s ), which is the number of emission lines among twenty three candidate lines (counted with 'weights' between 0 and 2, values of Basu 1973a), that lie for certain redshifts in the visible part of the spectrum, is a quantitative measure of search lines that are available for identification with observed lines, and is one such 'effect'. It is associated with the determination of redshift and is completely independant of the way the object is chosen. It is thus not an optical effect (Depaquit et al. 1985;Arp et al. 1990) that cannot affect redshift measurement of quasars chosen on non-optical basis.A second selection effect also known to influence quasar redshift distribution is the change of observed magnitude and hence brightness of the object as emission lines enter different observing filters resulting in brighter quasars being more easily discovered (Basu, 1987). The effect of emission lines on the U filter is the change in the U magnitude of QSOs (U L ), measured as the number of lines (counted with 'weights' between 0 and 2, values of Basu 1973a), lying in the range of the U-filter, for certain redshift values.We were therefore prompted to investigate whether the periodicity found by Arp et al. (1990) is real over the entire redshift domain or have appeared as a result of any ...