1994
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v83.9.2731.2731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cell concentration on bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell cryopreservation

Abstract: The effects of cell concentration during cryopreservation on bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB)-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells have not been described. The much greater numbers of cells harvested for autologous PB stem cell (PBSC) transplantation requires that the cells be frozen at higher cell concentrations, or in much greater volumes, compared with BM. We cryopreserved 108 PBSC collections from 30 patients at an average (+/- SD) cell concentration of 3.7 +/- 1.9 x 10(8) nucleated cells per mL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
40
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to other reports describing no effect of the cell concentration in cryopreservation mixture, 24,28 in our study cell concentration impacted postthawing recovery of CD34+ cells, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes, but not cell viability. A better understanding of how cryopreservation affects progenitor cells 30 in different ways in line with diagnoses, mobilization, and cell concentration might permit a more rational use of freezing procedures and should help us to explain these discordances.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to other reports describing no effect of the cell concentration in cryopreservation mixture, 24,28 in our study cell concentration impacted postthawing recovery of CD34+ cells, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes, but not cell viability. A better understanding of how cryopreservation affects progenitor cells 30 in different ways in line with diagnoses, mobilization, and cell concentration might permit a more rational use of freezing procedures and should help us to explain these discordances.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors describe decreased counts of CD34+ cells after thawing while others find increased amounts, 5,6,18 differences that, in our opinion, could have been induced by the use of short and heterogeneous series of patient and variable progenitor cell mobilization protocol. Additionally, diversity in the way to express results, percentage, concentration/mL, recovery, or millions/kg could have also contributed 5,8,18,24,25 . Accordingly to previous results described for Sartor and colleagues, 26 in our series the amount of CD34+ cells ×10 6 /L slightly but significantly decreased after thawing when the total group of samples was analyzed, although no significant differences could be demonstrated when diagnoses were studied separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The present study showed that the cryopreservation of PBPC components at cell concentrations 3.3 (1.8‐6.2)‐fold the standard had no adverse effect on the in vitro functionality of HPCs after thawing or on hematopoietic recovery after transplantation. Our findings are in agreement with the results published by Rowley et al, 12 and they contrast with the decreased recovery of CFU–GM found by Keung et al 11 when PBPCs were cryopreserved at high cell concentrations. In both studies, hematopoietic engraftment after transplantation was not adversely affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…To date, there are no conclusive results as to the implementation of these strategies. To our knowledge, only two studies focused on an analysis of the effect of cell concentration on the cryopreservation of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have been published, with discordant results in terms of functional recovery of PBPCs 11,12 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that when HPCs are stored overnight at RT with a cell concentration of greater than 200 × 10 9 /L, there is a significant reduction of the cell viability and the recovery of CD34+ cells and colony‐forming unit–granulocyte‐macrophage (CFU‐GM) 8 . However, cells stored at concentrations between 400 × 10 9 to 500 × 10 9 /L but cryopreserved within 4 hours of collection showed satisfactory postthaw characteristics 9 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%