1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199612000-00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Cefazolin and Vancomycin on Osteoblasts In Vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
134
2
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
134
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the difference in treatment duration between the current and previous studies, our data are consistent with several other studies in which shorter time periods were used and/or difference cell types were studied. 12,14,15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] This similarity both adds validity to our data and suggests that the negative effects imparted by high levels of antibiotics in this study may be a result of changes that occur at early time points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the difference in treatment duration between the current and previous studies, our data are consistent with several other studies in which shorter time periods were used and/or difference cell types were studied. 12,14,15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] This similarity both adds validity to our data and suggests that the negative effects imparted by high levels of antibiotics in this study may be a result of changes that occur at early time points.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…18 Previous studies showed a potential benefit of antibiotics on osteogenic potential, especially the cephalosporins. For example, the cephalosporin cefurotoxime has the potential to increase ALP activity and proliferation, 23 and a cefazolin-loaded biodegradable polypeptide multilayer nanofilm improved osteoblast viability and proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of our observed cytotoxic and cytostatic effects of clindamycin, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, linezolid, chloramphenicol, rifampin, and tetracycline on PHO can be explained by an impairment of mitochondrial energetics, whereas the inhibitors of the bacterial cell wall syntheses (with the exception of cefazolin with an unknown eukaryotic target [16]) and aminoglycosides displayed no effect on PHO because of ab- sence of a specific target or because they could not enter the cells in the absence of a specific receptor (34,43). In contrast, chloramphenicol and linezolid increased the lactate production comparable to the specific inhibitors of the respiratory chain presumably by inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis, which was actually shown in vitro for chloramphenicol (30,39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Larger tendons also eluted drug for longer periods of time; however, the differences in amounts of vancomycin released after 1 hour were small. Despite this difference, vancomycin release during the first 10 minutes and cumulatively during the 24-hour period was lower than the concentration ([ 1000 lg/mL) shown to be toxic to osteoblasts [6]. Therefore, in addition to decreasing infection rates, vancomycin released from tendons should not affect healing time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Vancomycin has been used routinely for local antibiotic infusion into joints, and in vitro studies have provided some evidence of its low osteoclast and chondrocyte toxicity [2,6] We therefore characterized the elution of vancomycin from tendons treated using the same above-mentioned protocol currently undergoing trials during surgery and determined what parameters influenced the rate and extent of observed drug elution. The primary aim was to evaluate the effect of rinsing on the rate and extent of vancomycin elution from tendon tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%