2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of carvedilol vs metoprolol succinate on mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Abstract: Patients with HFrEF taking carvedilol had improved survival as compared to metoprolol succinate. The data supports the need for furthering testing to determine optimal choice of beta blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above observations are not in line with an article recently published in American Heart Journal, which reported superiority of carvedilol compared to metoprolol succinate in the largest to date group of patients with heart failure and impaired left ventricular systolic func-tion [55]. Primary analysis included 114 745 patients with heart failure treated with carvedilol or metoprolol and, after propensity score analysis, patients were matched with regard to age, sex, comorbidities, other medication and their doses, resulting in homogeneous groups of 43 941 patients in each arm of the study.…”
Section: Contcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The above observations are not in line with an article recently published in American Heart Journal, which reported superiority of carvedilol compared to metoprolol succinate in the largest to date group of patients with heart failure and impaired left ventricular systolic func-tion [55]. Primary analysis included 114 745 patients with heart failure treated with carvedilol or metoprolol and, after propensity score analysis, patients were matched with regard to age, sex, comorbidities, other medication and their doses, resulting in homogeneous groups of 43 941 patients in each arm of the study.…”
Section: Contcontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The improved survival of carvedilol over metoprolol succinate is consistent to our previous study. (8) From the treatment effects model, we find that the estimated average time to mortality when all matched sample were treated using low dose was 6.6. When the entire matched sample were treated with high dose of beta blocker, the average time to death was estimated to increase by 1.35 years (or 20% increase) than when all matched sample were treated using low dose of beta blocker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Second-generation β-blockers (metoprolol and bisoprolol) are safe to use in HF but are of limited efficacy due to their selective β 1 (and not α and β 2 ) receptor blockade. 79 A more recent innovation in the treatment of diabetic HF is the use of a combination of sacubitril and valsartan. The most powerful member of this group is carvedilol, which, in addition to being a powerful anti-oxidant, selectively blocks α, β 1 and β 2 receptors, and has been shown in enhanced myocardial contractility to reverse remodelling and improve the ejection fraction in patients with HFrEF.…”
Section: Diagnosis Screening and Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…77 The increase in insulin resistance that occurs with most β-blockers does not occur with carvedilol and HbA1c decreases, insulin sensitivity improves and progression to microalbuminuria occurs less frequently 78 ; therefore, carvedilol should not be withheld in patients with diabetes. 79 A more recent innovation in the treatment of diabetic HF is the use of a combination of sacubitril and valsartan. Sacubitril antagonizes the action of neprilysin, which degrades peptides including angiotensin and bradykinin.…”
Section: Diagnosis Screening and Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%