2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of carbonization temperature on electrical resistivity and physical properties of wood and wood-based composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recorded bulk conductivity of HC is 75 000 S m −1 owing to its conductive nanographite domains, showing a conductivity as high as that of artificial graphite (≈10 5 S m −1 ) . This value is much higher than other wood‐derived hard carbons reported so far . On the other hand, the conductivity of A–HC with 10 wt% PTFE is 240 S m −1 despite the very low conductivity of PTFE (5.1 × 10 −17 S m −1 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recorded bulk conductivity of HC is 75 000 S m −1 owing to its conductive nanographite domains, showing a conductivity as high as that of artificial graphite (≈10 5 S m −1 ) . This value is much higher than other wood‐derived hard carbons reported so far . On the other hand, the conductivity of A–HC with 10 wt% PTFE is 240 S m −1 despite the very low conductivity of PTFE (5.1 × 10 −17 S m −1 ) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…[35] The recorded bulk conductivity of HC is 75 000 S m −1 owing to its conductive nanographite domains, showing a conductivity as high as that of artificial graphite (≈10 5 S m −1 ). [37][38][39] On the other hand, the conductivity of A-HC with 10 wt% PTFE is 240 S m −1 despite the very low conductivity of PTFE (5.1 × 10 −17 S m −1 ). [37][38][39] On the other hand, the conductivity of A-HC with 10 wt% PTFE is 240 S m −1 despite the very low conductivity of PTFE (5.1 × 10 −17 S m −1 ).…”
Section: Structural and Electrochemical Characterization Of Hc And A-hcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The c-MDF showed approximately 1.8 times higher moisture buffering capacity than the MDF without carbonization treatment. Carbonized wood-based materials, including c-MDF, can be considered disordered carbon and can greatly affect moisture-absorbing capacity (Kwon et al 2013). In this study, loess-treated c-MDF showed a 100% increase in moisture absorbing and desorbing properties.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The carbonization process does not require any chemical additions, and the cellular anatomical features of the wood are retained in the new carbon material (Treusch et al 2004). In the authors' previous study, carbonized wood-based materials were introduced for use as environmentally friendly indoor construction materials, because they had excellent flame retardant qualities, sound absorption, electrical resistance, and hygric performance (Kwon et al 2013;Lee et al 2014;Park et al 2014). In particular, Lee et al (2014) reported that the moisture absorption and desorption capacity of medium-density fiberboard (MDF) were significantly improved by carbonization, and that the highest value was obtained at 600 °C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6a shows the resistance of the carbon fibers decreased from 2.4 Ω to 1.9 Ω as the sintering temperature increased from 1200°C to 1350°C. The resistance could be related to the graphitization degree of carbon fibers with a turbostratic structure, which may be influenced by the carbonization temperature [36,37]. In addition, the densification of the ceramic composites may further compact the carbon fibers inside, which could contribute to the increased conductivity of the ceramic composites obtained at higher temperature.…”
Section: Micromorphology Of the Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%