1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Carbonate Content and Crystallinity on the Metastable Equilibrium Solubility Behavior of Carbonated Apatites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
54
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
11
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…5 that the MES is not simply related to the carbonate content of CAP. We have previously (27) shown, for a large number of CAPs prepared by the DCPD hydrolysis method, that CAP crystallinity was the dominant factor determining the magnitude of the MES, and, when crystallinity is taken into account, carbonate may have no further effect upon the MES. Furthermore, a recent study in our laboratory suggests that microstrain rather than crystallite size may dominate crystallinity in these CAP preparations (39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5 that the MES is not simply related to the carbonate content of CAP. We have previously (27) shown, for a large number of CAPs prepared by the DCPD hydrolysis method, that CAP crystallinity was the dominant factor determining the magnitude of the MES, and, when crystallinity is taken into account, carbonate may have no further effect upon the MES. Furthermore, a recent study in our laboratory suggests that microstrain rather than crystallite size may dominate crystallinity in these CAP preparations (39).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For each plot, a smaller pIAP value corresponds to a solution with a higher degree of saturation. The fraction of CAP dissolved for a given solution then represents the fraction of CAP crystals with MESs that would be higher than that corresponding to the IAP value for that solution (25,27). As an example, a fraction of 0.54 (see dashed lines in these plots) was obtained for the 1.8% CAP equilibrated in a solution with 2.66 mM of Ca, 1.47 mM of PO 4 at the pH of 5.5 and the ionic strength of 0.50 M. The pIAPs for this same solution can be calculated as pIAP DCPD ϭ 8.0, pIAP OCP ϭ 105.75, pIAP TCP ϭ 32.7, pIAP HAP ϭ 118.0, pIAP CAP ϭ 116.9 (a CO 2 partial pressure of 2.65 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 atm was used for the atmosphere in Salt Lake City, UT), and pIAP TeCP ϭ 52.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…O controle de tais parâmetros estruturais é importante, pois variam de acordo com a metodologia empregada na preparação da amostra 4 . Por exemplo, Baig et al 5 mostraram que a solubilidade aparente de apatitas carbonatadas apresenta forte correlação com o parâmetro de deformação Lorentziana da função de ajuste do perfil utilizada.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified