2021
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2020-719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Carbon and Nitrogen on <i>Md</i><sub>30</sub> in Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel

Abstract: Md 30 is defined as the temperature at which 50 vol.% of α'-martensite is formed at a true tensile strain of 0.3 in metastable austenitic steels. The effect of C concentration on Md 30 is known to be identical to that of N, as shown by Nohara's equation. However, we found that Md 30 of C-added steel is lower than that of N-added steel, which indicates that the effect of C concentration on the mechanical stability of austenite is more significant than that of N. In addition, the relationship between Md 30 and C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison between C-and N-added steels reveals that the volume fraction of DIM in C-added steels is lower than that in N-added steels, meaning that the mechanical stabilizing effect of C is higher than that of N, as reported in a previous study. [4][5][6] In these steels, ε-martensite with HCP structure is also formed as an intermediate phase of the γ→α' transformation, but we confirmed that the amount was small (5 vol.% at most) and the ε→α' transformation was completed at 70% cold rolling for all steels. 4) Figure 2 shows phase + image quality (IQ) maps (a)-(c) and crystallographic orientation maps extracted only DIM (BCC) (d)-(f) in 20% cold-rolled Base (a) (d), 0.1C (b) (e), and 0.1N steel (c) (f).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison between C-and N-added steels reveals that the volume fraction of DIM in C-added steels is lower than that in N-added steels, meaning that the mechanical stabilizing effect of C is higher than that of N, as reported in a previous study. [4][5][6] In these steels, ε-martensite with HCP structure is also formed as an intermediate phase of the γ→α' transformation, but we confirmed that the amount was small (5 vol.% at most) and the ε→α' transformation was completed at 70% cold rolling for all steels. 4) Figure 2 shows phase + image quality (IQ) maps (a)-(c) and crystallographic orientation maps extracted only DIM (BCC) (d)-(f) in 20% cold-rolled Base (a) (d), 0.1C (b) (e), and 0.1N steel (c) (f).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In the 0.1C and 0.1N steels, DIM grains are aligned along straight lines within austenite grains, indicating that the DIM was nucleated in plate-like structures including deformation twins and ε-martensite developed in austenite. [4][5][6][14][15][16] The block size of DIM is fine, similar to that of Base steel. The effects of C and N on the mechanical stability of austenite, the transformation mechanism, and the crystallographic characteristics of DIM have already been studied in detail from the previous reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mechanical stability of austenite has been the subject of many studies. In addition to the chemical composition, [5][6][7] crystallographic orientation, 8) and size [9][10][11] of austenite, various factors, such as the type of matrix phase 12) and the strength difference between matrix and austenite, 13) have been reported to affect austenite mechanical stability. In the austempering, which is a general heat treatment to obtain retained austenite in low-alloy carbon steel, carbon (C) is enriched in the untransformed austenite through bainitic transformation, low-alloy TRIP assisted steel.…”
Section: Morphology Dependence On Mechanical Stability Of Secondphase...mentioning
confidence: 99%