2021
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.9508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Canakinumab vs Placebo on Survival Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe COVID-19

Abstract: Key PointsQuestionIs the anti–interleukin-1β antibody canakinumab effective to treat patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and hyperinflammation?FindingThis randomized clinical trial included 454 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and with elevated C-reactive protein or ferritin levels. Treatment with intravenous canakinumab vs placebo resulted in survival without IMV at 29 days of 88.8% vs 85.7%, a difference that was not statistically significant.Mean… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
9

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
69
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Since that initial recommendation, several randomized controlled trials evaluating IL‐1 inhibition in adults with COVID‐19 have been published, with conflicting results. The CAN‐COVID study showed no benefit of canakinumab compared to placebo in adults with COVID‐19 pneumonia and systemic inflammation who were not yet mechanically ventilated (134). The CORIMUNO‐ANA‐1 trial evaluating anakinra for adults with mild‐to‐moderate COVID‐19 and elevated CRP levels was stopped for futility (135).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that initial recommendation, several randomized controlled trials evaluating IL‐1 inhibition in adults with COVID‐19 have been published, with conflicting results. The CAN‐COVID study showed no benefit of canakinumab compared to placebo in adults with COVID‐19 pneumonia and systemic inflammation who were not yet mechanically ventilated (134). The CORIMUNO‐ANA‐1 trial evaluating anakinra for adults with mild‐to‐moderate COVID‐19 and elevated CRP levels was stopped for futility (135).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many trials mainly with IL‐1 or IL‐6 blockade and Janus‐kinase inhibition have been performed to see whether these treatments inhibit the severity of COVID‐19, resulting in positive or negative results with speculation on these results. 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 On the other hand, recent studies have indicated that treatment with anakinra, an IL‐1 α/β inhibitor, decreased the 28 day mortality only in patients with a plasma level higher than 6 ng/mL of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), an early predictor of severe respiratory failure in COVID‐19 patients, 46 who received dexamethasone. 47 This result suggests that conditions of cytokine production induced by the infection is fairly complex in that the cell interactions involved in cytokine production sequentially change depending on many determinants such as viral dose, functional conditions of involved inflammatory/immune cells, and genetic factors of infected hosts.…”
Section: The Importance Of Sequence and Tempo Of Inflammatory And Imm...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further revision of available data [64] showed no added benefit to anti-IL-1 agents when compared to standard care that includes dexamethasone or other glucocorticoids [65, 66]. Limited clinical data regarding canakinumab [67] and rilonacept [65, 66] show similar, and disappointing, results. While no RCTs evaluated patients with HM specifically, anecdotal evidence supports the lack of added efficacy of anakinra to standard COVID-19 therapy in patients with HM [68, 69].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%