2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3785856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Building Platform Position on the Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Geometrical Precision of Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) Parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural porosity is generally high in SLM structures, and the variability can further increase depending on the part location. The change in surface roughness and mechanical strength due to part position in the powder bed has been discussed previously in the literature [1,5,16]. Since the samples were developed at optimized laser parameters provided by machine (EOS) suppliers, there are limited chances to improve the overall mechanical properties by choosing other optimized processing parameters.…”
Section: Linear Regression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The structural porosity is generally high in SLM structures, and the variability can further increase depending on the part location. The change in surface roughness and mechanical strength due to part position in the powder bed has been discussed previously in the literature [1,5,16]. Since the samples were developed at optimized laser parameters provided by machine (EOS) suppliers, there are limited chances to improve the overall mechanical properties by choosing other optimized processing parameters.…”
Section: Linear Regression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties in powder granulometry within the build chamber, such as powder size, shape, distribution, and powder packing density, can significantly alter final mechanical and surface properties, hindering parts' repeatability and product quality [5,14,15]. Moreover, the processing conditions such as the scanning location, geometry type, and atmospheric conditions can alter the final mechanical properties of the SLM components [16,17]. Therefore, the mechanical properties of SLM components fabricated with identical laser parameters can still have different surface roughness, density, and mechanical strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other articles look at processspecific relationships, such as the effects of shielding gas flow (Bean et al, 2018). (Oter et al, 2020) As shown in Table 2, studies have produced contradictory results. Such as Baciu et al (2019) found that as laser scan velocity increases so may the surface roughness value.…”
Section: Build Parameter Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, as particle powder size reduces, enabling the creation of finer features in parts, Balbaa et al (2021) found that the surface roughness increases, whereas Conlon and Azari (2018) found the opposite. Oter et al (2020) found through varying part positioning within an EOS machine, that the roughness is dependent on the part geometry and inclination of the walls due to the machine's laser incidence. Increasing the energy density, through varying laser power, scanning velocity, hatch distance or powder layer thickness, leads to an initial reduction in the surface roughness of parts.…”
Section: Build Parameter Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation