2002
DOI: 10.1299/jsmemecjo.2002.7.0_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bubble size on the microbubble drag reduction of a turbulent boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Takahashi et al (2001) examined BDR at Re x as high as 25 million and found that variations in bubble size and boundary-layer thickness did not significantly influence the level of drag reduction. Kawamura et al (2003) found a similar insensitivity to bubble size for bubble radii of 250 to 1000 µm at similar Re x values. BDR studies have also involved axisymmetric bodies (Deutsch & Castano 1986;Clark & Deutsch 1991) and sea trials (Kodama et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Takahashi et al (2001) examined BDR at Re x as high as 25 million and found that variations in bubble size and boundary-layer thickness did not significantly influence the level of drag reduction. Kawamura et al (2003) found a similar insensitivity to bubble size for bubble radii of 250 to 1000 µm at similar Re x values. BDR studies have also involved axisymmetric bodies (Deutsch & Castano 1986;Clark & Deutsch 1991) and sea trials (Kodama et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Recent experimental studies in low-Re TBL flows (Kawamura et al 2003) confirm the importance of bubble size (and number density) in skin-friction drag reduction. Kawamura et al produced bubbles in two different size ranges using different injection methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The influence of bubble size on BDR has been difficult to ascertain for high-Reynolds number flows. Moriguchi & Kato (2002) and Kawamura et al (2003) reported no change in drag reduction over a range of injected bubble sizes, all of which were much larger than the viscous length. Winkel et al (2004) and Elbing et al (2008) used saltwater and surfactants to reduce the average bubble size with little change far from the injector.…”
Section: Mechanisms and Persistence Of Bubble Drag Reductionmentioning
confidence: 92%