2003
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2003.261.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Breed and Holding Period on Egg Quality Characteristics of Chicken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study it has been observed that Peshawari variety has significantly (P<0.05) higher shell % and haugh unit score than that of other varieties of Aseel and Naked-neck ( Table 1). The difference in haugh unit scores might be attributed to the differences in albumen height of observed birds which is in agreement with the results of [15] who reported different albumen heights for different breeds. These results are also in agreement with the [16] and Monira, Salahuddin [15] who also observed different Haugh unit scores of different breeds.…”
Section: Egg Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study it has been observed that Peshawari variety has significantly (P<0.05) higher shell % and haugh unit score than that of other varieties of Aseel and Naked-neck ( Table 1). The difference in haugh unit scores might be attributed to the differences in albumen height of observed birds which is in agreement with the results of [15] who reported different albumen heights for different breeds. These results are also in agreement with the [16] and Monira, Salahuddin [15] who also observed different Haugh unit scores of different breeds.…”
Section: Egg Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The difference in haugh unit scores might be attributed to the differences in albumen height of observed birds which is in agreement with the results of [15] who reported different albumen heights for different breeds. These results are also in agreement with the [16] and Monira, Salahuddin [15] who also observed different Haugh unit scores of different breeds. However, higher shell % of Mushki variety of Aseel has been observed by [17] whose observations are in contradiction with our study.…”
Section: Egg Qualitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Er et al (2014) reported the use of monochromatic light to increase yolk index (EYI) and Haugh unit (HU). Moreover, Haugh unit is a measure of protein quality, evaluated based on the albumen height and egg weight (Monira et al 2003). The increase in value is linear with the egg white index (EAI), measured by dividing the height of thick albumen by half of the total longest and shortest diameters (Suswoyo & Rosidi, 2016).…”
Section: Internal and External Quality Of Eggsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disagreeing with the mean egg weight value of village chicken eggs in the present study, Elango and Mahendrarasa (2013) have reported that the mean egg weight of Sri Lankan village chicken was 43.43±1.9 g. The scholars have indicated that the low egg weight was due to low body weights of the village chicken hens. In addition, Monira et al (2003) reported that the weights of eggs from Barred Plymouth Rock, White Leghorn, Rhode Island Red and White Rock as 64.00, 63.00, 57.20 and 57.00 g, respectively. The mean weight of quail eggs in the present study was (9.47±5.64 g).…”
Section: Comparison Of Village Chicken Shaver Brown Duck Turkey Anmentioning
confidence: 99%