1995
DOI: 10.1002/bscb.19951040412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Boron Addition on the State and Dispersion of Mo Supported on Alumina

Abstract: The influence of B on the state and dispersion of Mo phases on A1203 have been investigated by bulk and surface characterization techniques, e.g., XRD, XPS and TPR, respectively. In the absence of B, the dispersion of Mo phases Is in good agreement with the theoretical value calculated from Kerkhof-Moulijn model, suggesting that Mo atoms disperse easily on A1203 surface. XPS results indicate that B addition to A1203 leads the Mo dispersion to decrease in comparison with the theoretical mondayer value. This res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Al(2p) peak is observed in all spectra, and the measured binding energies (73.7–74.0 eV) are in the expected range for γ‐Al 2 O 3 . The B(1s) peak grows in intensity with increasing B loading and its binding energy (192.2–192.5 eV) is close to the value for interfacial aluminum borate (9Al 2 O 3 ⋅ 2B 2 O 3 ) of 192.5 eV, which is below the binding energy of bulk B 2 O 3 (193.5 eV), and nearly identical to values reported for a B 2 O 3 surface layer on γ‐Al 2 O 3 . The B(1s)/Al(2p) peak area ratio increases linearly with increasing B loading up to ∼4.7 wt % B, beyond which the peak area ratio increases more slowly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Al(2p) peak is observed in all spectra, and the measured binding energies (73.7–74.0 eV) are in the expected range for γ‐Al 2 O 3 . The B(1s) peak grows in intensity with increasing B loading and its binding energy (192.2–192.5 eV) is close to the value for interfacial aluminum borate (9Al 2 O 3 ⋅ 2B 2 O 3 ) of 192.5 eV, which is below the binding energy of bulk B 2 O 3 (193.5 eV), and nearly identical to values reported for a B 2 O 3 surface layer on γ‐Al 2 O 3 . The B(1s)/Al(2p) peak area ratio increases linearly with increasing B loading up to ∼4.7 wt % B, beyond which the peak area ratio increases more slowly.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[24] The B(1s) peak grows in intensity with increasing B loading and its binding energy (192.2-192.5 eV) is close to the value for interfacial aluminum borate (9Al 2 O 3 • 2B 2 O 3 ) of 192.5 eV, [25] which is below the binding energy of bulk B 2 O 3 (193.5 eV [25] ), and nearly identical to values reported for a B 2 O 3 surface layer on γ-Al 2 O 3 . [21,[25][26][27] The B(1s)/Al(2p) peak area ratio increases linearly with increasing B loading up to~4.7 wt % B, beyond which the peak area ratio increases more slowly. These results are consistent with previous XPS studies, [21,[25][26] and indicate the growth of well dispersed B 2 O 3 species on the γ-Al 2 O 3 support up to monolayer coverage.…”
Section: Characterization Of Xbà Al 2 O 3 Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Usman et al reported that boron may change low active Co–Mo–S type I sites to high Co–Mo–S type II sites. On the other hand, Morishige and Akai reported that boron decreases dispersion of molybdenum on an alumina support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…89,[115][116][117][118] El boro ha sido uno de los aditivos más investigados. Los resultados más aceptados indican que un efecto positivo sobre la dispersión del molibdeno, 119,120 así como sobre propiedades ácidas del soporte. [121][122][123][124] El efecto del boro sobre la actividad de los catalizadores NiMo y CoMo, al igual que los cationes antes presentados, es controvertido.…”
Section: Aditivos Catiónicos Trivalentes Y Tetravalentesunclassified