2005
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01235.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of body tilt on calf muscle performance and blood flow in humans

Abstract: To explore the effect of posture on muscle performance, we tested the effects of body tilt angle on the strength, endurance, and fatigue of, and blood flow into, the plantar flexors. Human subjects were fixed to a tilt table that could tilt them from the horizontal (0 degrees ) to upright (90 degrees ) position and enabled force to be applied to a footplate through isometric action of the right calf muscle. In experiment 1, six subjects performed a strength test and graded test (intermittent contractions) to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
69
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, neither the end-exercise value or phasic amplitudes of LVC were significantly affected by type 2 diabetes ( Table 2), suggesting that the capacity to vasodilate under exercise conditions that evoke near-maximal blood flows 18 remains intact. However, the phase 1 amplitude and endexercise value for LVC was 15-20% lower in the diabetic group and, although this difference was not significant, the large between-subject variation in responses might have obscured an important physiological difference which warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Impaired Vascular Control In Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, neither the end-exercise value or phasic amplitudes of LVC were significantly affected by type 2 diabetes ( Table 2), suggesting that the capacity to vasodilate under exercise conditions that evoke near-maximal blood flows 18 remains intact. However, the phase 1 amplitude and endexercise value for LVC was 15-20% lower in the diabetic group and, although this difference was not significant, the large between-subject variation in responses might have obscured an important physiological difference which warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Impaired Vascular Control In Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Then, on a following day, the subject rested for 20 min in the supine position during which resting cardiovascular measurements were made (see the 'Leg vascular conductance' section), before being tilted upright to the inclined position and commencing calf exercise soon after. 18 Calf exercise consisted of intermittent and static contractions of the calf muscle (6 s duty cycle: 2 s contraction, 4 s relaxation) at a target force of 70% MVC. Each subject performed three calf exercise trials, separated by 20-30 min of rest in the supine position, and the duration of each exercise trial was 6 minutes.…”
Section: Calf Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All participants visited the cardiovascular performance laboratory at Trinity College Dublin on two or three separate occasions separated by at least 48 h. Of the female subjects, six were premenopausal (1 with T2D and 5 nondiabetics), and their testing dates were scheduled to occur during the midfollicular phase of their menstrual cycle (days [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Before each visit subjects were asked to refrain from consuming caffeine and alcohol in the 24 h prior to testing, in addition to limiting exercise to activities of daily living.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an upright posture produces a hydrostatic column, shifting blood to the lower limbs and differentially increasing both leg arterial and venous pressure, such that femoral perfusion pressure (FPP) is increased. Therefore, as a consequence of this posture-induced increase in FPP, resting LBF may be elevated (12). Furthermore, young males exhibit a significant vasodilatory reserve (difference in ⌬LVC peak between uprightseated and supine posture) that facilitates a LBF response to passive movement in the upright-seated posture that is more than double that of the supine posture (47).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%