2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of biofouling roughness on the full-scale powering performance of a submarine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the percentage of the total resistance due to skin friction is greater for submarines than for surface ships [11]. This has been investigated recently by Uzun et al [12,13]. Song et al [14] also showed that the total resistance coefficient in shallow water increases between 22% and 36% due to biofouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the percentage of the total resistance due to skin friction is greater for submarines than for surface ships [11]. This has been investigated recently by Uzun et al [12,13]. Song et al [14] also showed that the total resistance coefficient in shallow water increases between 22% and 36% due to biofouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Uzun et al [13] also investigated the influence of the longitudinal position of the roughness on a submerged submarine. They found that when the roughness is located in the forward part of the submarine only, the increase in total resistance is greater than when it is located only further aft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much discussion about the eff ect of surface roughness caused by several reasons such as welding seams, coatings, or biofouling on the force of resistance characteristics of submarines. In a study conducted by Uzun et al [18], the impact of barnacle type biofouling roughness on submarine performance is examined. The eff ects of antifouling coating system, with a range of roughness and fouling conditions, on the force of resistance and powering characteristics were evaluated by Schultz [19].…”
Section: Introduction / Uvod*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the remaining CGI 12 < 2.5%. However, the error bands considerably larger than what has been reported in literature as being of an acceptable range [221,250,109,227] With respect to the convergence ratio (R), all cases are evaluated to be of monotonic convergence 0 < R < 1, thus each case will have a reasonable prediction of the zero-grid spacing h → 0 value.…”
Section: Analytical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5.3 summarises the order of accuracy and GCI of three grid resolutions, being Mesh-F, Mesh-E and Mesh-C which posses a uniform refinement ratio between each and are denoted through subscripts respective of ascending order. The refinement ratio(r c ) was selected as 2, which while within limits stated in literature, is at the maximum [209,208,39,250]. Each tested across five non-dimensional dependant variables of interest, being the Reynolds number across the gap, the decay constant for the jet centreline velocity, the position of the virtual origin, the length of the potential core and the position of 95% depth averaged velocity magnitude reduction.…”
Section: Analytical Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%