2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of biodynamic soil amendments on microbial communities in comparison with inorganic fertilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher Cmic/Nmic ratio in 2005 indicated a shift in microbial communities 50 which seemed to be a single effect as it was not confirmed in later soil analyses. This is in line with soil microbial studies that similarly did not find effects of biodynamic preparations on soil microbial communities 55,59 . Regarding microbial activity, Zaller and Kopke 58 reported lower basal respiration and metabolic coefficients with biodynamic preparations, whereas in this and other studies, enzyme activities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher Cmic/Nmic ratio in 2005 indicated a shift in microbial communities 50 which seemed to be a single effect as it was not confirmed in later soil analyses. This is in line with soil microbial studies that similarly did not find effects of biodynamic preparations on soil microbial communities 55,59 . Regarding microbial activity, Zaller and Kopke 58 reported lower basal respiration and metabolic coefficients with biodynamic preparations, whereas in this and other studies, enzyme activities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding microbial activity, Zaller and Kopke 58 reported lower basal respiration and metabolic coefficients with biodynamic preparations, whereas in this and other studies, enzyme activities (e.g. dehydrogenase activity in our case) or respiration measurements yielded no treatment differences 55,57,59 . There is hence not a clear effect of biodynamic preparations on soil quality.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Higher contents of organic matter in the soil generally favor AMF, since it is known that increases in edaphic carbon enhance the microbiotic activity, the carbon stock, and the diversity and activity of AMF . Moreover, greater proliferation of hyphae and spores occurs in soils with application of organic fertilizers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More DNA seems to be extractable from actively straw-decomposing fungi. It should be noted that the DNA from arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi is hardly extractable (Hartmann et al, 2015), despite the probably high contribution of this fungal phylum to the microbial biomass (Faust et al, 2017). Another reason for the rather low correlation between MBC and extractable DNA might be the presence of residual DNA of soil microorganisms and plants in soil or interference of DNA with humic compounds during extraction (Pietramellara et al, 2009;Carini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Effects Of Salinity and Organic Amendments On C And N Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ergosterol is often used as an indicator of saprotrophic fungi (Joergensen and Wichern, 2008;Faust et al, 2017). Interestingly, in soil B after rice straw addition, salinity in anaerobic conditions enhanced fungi as indicated by increased ergosterol content and larger amounts of extractable ITS1 sequences.…”
Section: Distinct Microbial Response Of Different Soils Indicate Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%