1988
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000010003x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Biocidal Treatments on Cation Exchange Capacity and Fusarium Blight of Soybean in Delaware Soils

Abstract: Fusarium wilt has caused significant losses in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production and is very difficult to control because it is caused by the soil-borne fungus Fusarium oxysporum. A better understanding of the relationship between soil characteristics and the pathogen and between biocidal treatments and physiochemical properties is needed, especially for soils that appear to be suppressive. The effects of autoclaving and Vapam fumigation on cation exchange capacity, organic matter content. clay conte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autoclaving is known to alter physicochemical characteristics of soil (Mcnamara et al, 2003;Berns et al, 2010;Traoré et al, 2010). Autoclaving is known to increase the soil pH (Jörn et al, 1993), to decrease the cation exchange capacity (CEC), and increasing the electrical conductivity (EC) of soil and N (NH 4 + and NO 3 − ) is not an significant change (Sandler et al, 1988). After collection, the sampled soil was divided into two portions, one of which was sterilized by autoclaving at 121 • C for 1 h. Soil physicochemical characteristics are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoclaving is known to alter physicochemical characteristics of soil (Mcnamara et al, 2003;Berns et al, 2010;Traoré et al, 2010). Autoclaving is known to increase the soil pH (Jörn et al, 1993), to decrease the cation exchange capacity (CEC), and increasing the electrical conductivity (EC) of soil and N (NH 4 + and NO 3 − ) is not an significant change (Sandler et al, 1988). After collection, the sampled soil was divided into two portions, one of which was sterilized by autoclaving at 121 • C for 1 h. Soil physicochemical characteristics are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Soil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%