The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33457
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Bimagrumab vs Placebo on Body Fat Mass Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Antibody blockade of activin type II receptor (ActRII) signaling stimulates skeletal muscle growth. Previous clinical studies suggest that ActRII inhibition with the monoclonal antibody bimagrumab also promotes excess adipose tissue loss and improves insulin resistance.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimagrumab on body composition and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes and overweight and obesity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis double-masked, placebo-controlled, 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…At week 48, the changes for bimagrumab vs placebo were as follows: fat mass, −20.5% (−7.5 kg; 80% CI, −8.3 to −6.6 kg) vs. −0.5% (−0.18 kg; 80% CI, −0.99 to 0.63 kg) (P< 0.001); lean mass, 3.6% (1.70 kg; 80% CI, 1.1 to 2.3 kg) vs. −0.8% (−0.4 kg; 80% CI, −1.0 to 0.1 kg) ( P <0.001). 38 Thus rather loss of both lean and fat with weight loss with the typical ratio of 25:75, 29 bimagrumab was associated with loss of fat mass and gain in lean mass. 38 Safety will need to be evaluated further; there were cases of elevations of pancreas and liver enzymes with bimagrumab compared to placebo in this small study.…”
Section: Bimagrumabmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At week 48, the changes for bimagrumab vs placebo were as follows: fat mass, −20.5% (−7.5 kg; 80% CI, −8.3 to −6.6 kg) vs. −0.5% (−0.18 kg; 80% CI, −0.99 to 0.63 kg) (P< 0.001); lean mass, 3.6% (1.70 kg; 80% CI, 1.1 to 2.3 kg) vs. −0.8% (−0.4 kg; 80% CI, −1.0 to 0.1 kg) ( P <0.001). 38 Thus rather loss of both lean and fat with weight loss with the typical ratio of 25:75, 29 bimagrumab was associated with loss of fat mass and gain in lean mass. 38 Safety will need to be evaluated further; there were cases of elevations of pancreas and liver enzymes with bimagrumab compared to placebo in this small study.…”
Section: Bimagrumabmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Bimagrumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the activin type II receptor to block natural ligands that negatively regulate skeletal muscle growth. 36 , 37 Bimagrumab was tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 48-week, phase 2 randomized clinical trial 38 in adults with type 2 diabetes and BMI 28–40 kg/m 2 . Bimagrumab was dosed at 10 mg/kg up to 1,200 mg in 5% dextrose solution and compared to placebo every 4 weeks for 48 weeks; both groups received diet and exercise counseling.…”
Section: Bimagrumabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples are the future combinations of drugs such as GLP1 agonists with GIP, Glucagon, or oxynomodulin (dual agonists or triagonists), the combination of Semaglutide with an amylin analog (Cagrilintide) 179 or the novel Bimagrumab which is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the type II activin receptor that regulates skeletal muscle growth, but also decreases adipose tissue improving insulin resistance. 180 …”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to blocking ACVR2 ligands, bimagrumab (BYM-338), a monoclonal antibody against ACVR2 receptors, was found effective in increasing muscle size and attenuating muscle loss in various animal and human studies [18], including in tumor hosts treated with chemotherapy [11]. More recently, in a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, ACVR2 blockade by bimagrumab led to loss of fat mass, gain in lean mass and metabolic improvements in type 2 diabetic patients who were overweight or obese [170], thereby supporting the use of such approach for the pharmacologic management of excess adiposity and metabolic disturbances. Keeping this in mind, the use of such approach in cancer patients, often characterized by extensive loss of adipose tissue mass, may be detrimental (see Section 3.6.2) [171].…”
Section: Effects Of Blocking Acvr2 Signaling On Skeletal Musclementioning
confidence: 99%