2008
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bed dunes on spatial development of open-channel flow

Abstract: The spatial development of turbulent, sub-critical open-channel flow over five identical dunes is studied by the numerical solution of the RANS equations utilizing the VOF free-surface formulation and the k-ε or Spalart-Allmaras turbulence models. Results are presented for smooth and rough walls and several dune dimensions. One of the cases was also studied experimentally. The flow separation at each dune crest generates a recirculation in the dune lee-side and reattachment at a distance, which increases with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] The CFD model has been verified for flume surface hydraulics around complex bedforms in our prior research [Zhou and Endreny, 2012]; however, we further verified the CFD for turbulent surface flow using experimental data from van Mierlo and de Ruiter's [1988] flume experiment ''Run T6.'' These data have been widely adopted for CFD turbulent model verifications [e.g., Cardenas and Wilson, 2007;Dimas et al, 2008;Yoon and Patel, 1996]. The Run T6 flume experiment investigated the flow surface elevation, velocity profiles, and turbulence fluctuations over a fixed, impermeable, repeating dune geometry.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14] The CFD model has been verified for flume surface hydraulics around complex bedforms in our prior research [Zhou and Endreny, 2012]; however, we further verified the CFD for turbulent surface flow using experimental data from van Mierlo and de Ruiter's [1988] flume experiment ''Run T6.'' These data have been widely adopted for CFD turbulent model verifications [e.g., Cardenas and Wilson, 2007;Dimas et al, 2008;Yoon and Patel, 1996]. The Run T6 flume experiment investigated the flow surface elevation, velocity profiles, and turbulence fluctuations over a fixed, impermeable, repeating dune geometry.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data have been widely adopted for CFD turbulent model verifications [e.g., Cardenas and Wilson, 2007;Dimas et al, 2008;Yoon and Patel, 1996]. The Run T6 flume experiment investigated the flow surface elevation, velocity profiles, and turbulence fluctuations over a fixed, impermeable, repeating dune geometry.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the modelled Reynolds shear stresses u w ¢ ¢ were in reasonable agreement with the experimental measurements, although the values were overpredicted in the separation region and wake layer. This discrepancy might be partly attributed to the high velocity gradient predicted in the flow in the separation zone and partly due to the fact that the periodic boundary conditions used in the simulation were different from the actual flow condition in the experiment, which was not exactly periodic in the streamwise direction (Maddux et al, 2003b) and which could have enhanced the turbulence levels in the simulations, with this phenomena having been observed in a previous study of flow over 2D dunes by Dimas et al (2008). Figure 9 shows a comparison between the predicted streamwise-averaged mean streamwise velocities and secondary currents and the corresponding experimental measurements, along with dashed lines denoting the height and phase change of the two dune crest lines.…”
Section: Spanwise-averaged Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The length of flow separation over dunes has previously been shown to vary with hydraulic and geometric conditions, such as dune height and crestal shape (Araújo et al, 2013;Dimas et al, 2008;Engel, 1981;Kwoll et al, 2016;Simpson, 1989), leeside angle (Best & Kostaschuk, 2002;Kwoll et al, 2016), flow depth (Balachandar et al, 2007), flow velocity (Araújo et al, 2013;Engel, 1981), downstream bedform shape and distance (Dimas et al, 2008;Engel, 1981), and crestline curvature (Venditti, 2007). Such an array of controls has resulted in the parametrization of flow separation length tending to be achieved using empirically defined relationships derived from specific data sets, and thus not necessarily providing a fundamental description of the multitude of processes involved (e.g., Lefebvre et al, 2014;Paarlberg et al, 2007).…”
Section: 1029/2017wr021377mentioning
confidence: 99%