2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) attack on bark VOC emissions of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed growing season monthly mean monoterpene emission rates (1.6-2.4 ng m −2 s −1 ) were in the same range as previously reported lower stem bark monoterpene emission rates in non-stressed conditions from mature Norway spruce (Ghimire et al, 2016) and Scots pine trees (Rissanen et al, 2016), while also considerably higher emissions have been reported e.g., from Maritime pine stems (up to 99 ng m −2 s −1 ; Staudt et al, 2019). Upscaling to the stand level and assuming that all stems would be of an equal size, the average monoterpene emission rate from pine stems was 6.8 mg ha −1 h −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The observed growing season monthly mean monoterpene emission rates (1.6-2.4 ng m −2 s −1 ) were in the same range as previously reported lower stem bark monoterpene emission rates in non-stressed conditions from mature Norway spruce (Ghimire et al, 2016) and Scots pine trees (Rissanen et al, 2016), while also considerably higher emissions have been reported e.g., from Maritime pine stems (up to 99 ng m −2 s −1 ; Staudt et al, 2019). Upscaling to the stand level and assuming that all stems would be of an equal size, the average monoterpene emission rate from pine stems was 6.8 mg ha −1 h −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Stem MT emission bursts through the bark may occasionally reach 50 ng m −2 s −1 in spring although they normally stay below 10 ng m −2 s −1 in P. sylvestris (Vanhatalo et al 2015). Ghimire et al (2016) reported bark MT emissions from intact P. abies to be 3 ng m −2 s −1 . When compared to average MT emissions from mature pine needles of 0.34 ng m −2 s −1 (Ruuskanen et al 2005), it can be concluded that bark emissions may Plant roots can be important sources of BVOC emissions in forest ecosystems, but their measurement and quantification are difficult as root systems cannot be separated from the soil microbial network of mycorrhizal fungi and other rhizosphere microbes that also emit BVOCs (Peñuelas et al 2014;Ditengou et al 2015).…”
Section: Chemical Diversity Of Bvocs and Their Production In Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forest stands, the canopy layer of living trees has a substantial volume and leaf area and it acts as the most important emission source for BVOCs (Zhou et al 2017), but can also act as a sink when atmospheric BVOCs such as MTs are taken up through stomata or when reaction products of rapidly reactive BVOCs such as SQTs are deposited on foliage (Zhou et al 2017). In addition to green foliage, wood, phloem and bark of trunk and branches of living trees act as important pools of stored BVOCs such as oleoresin MTs in conifer forests (Taipale et al 2011;Ghimire et al 2016). Furthermore, some plant species such as woody shrubs (Himanen et al 2010;Mofikoya et al 2018) growing in the understory can act as significant emission sources.…”
Section: Bvocs Of Rhizosphere Litter and Understorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date only a few studies have focused on the interactive effects of elevated O 3 and warming on trees. These studies have addressed the responses of the photosynthetic rate (e.g., Hartikainen et al, 2012; Mäenpää et al, 2011; Riikonen et al, 2012), carbon allocation (Kasurinen et al, 2012), and production of biogenic volatile organic compounds (e.g., Ghimire et al, 2016; Hartikainen et al, 2009, 2012; Kivimäenpää et al, 2012) to factorial combinations of warming and elevated O 3 . To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the interactive effect of warming and O 3 exposure on the photosynthetic thermal acclimation capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%