2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Backrest Height on Wheelchair Propulsion Biomechanics for Level and Uphill Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents a significant MEF increase of approximately 18 percent with the increase in the slope. The decreasing tendency reported in the present study may be attributable to the higher propulsion speed than in Yang et al (i.e., 1.17 vs 0.9 m/s) [13]. In fact, Boninger et al maintained that the MEF decreases with increasing speed [34].…”
Section: Preservation Of Mechanical Effective Forcecontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This represents a significant MEF increase of approximately 18 percent with the increase in the slope. The decreasing tendency reported in the present study may be attributable to the higher propulsion speed than in Yang et al (i.e., 1.17 vs 0.9 m/s) [13]. In fact, Boninger et al maintained that the MEF decreases with increasing speed [34].…”
Section: Preservation Of Mechanical Effective Forcecontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In fact, when the slope progressively increased from 0° to 7.1° and the treadmill speed stayed the same, the MEF remained statistically constant between 0.45 and 0.38, with an observed tendency to decrease at the steepest slope. On the contrary, a study examining MEF in relation to MWC on a treadmill set at a constant speed of 0.9 m/s reported MEFs of about 0.50 during propulsion with 0° slope and an MEF of 0.55 when the slope rose to 3° [13]. This represents a significant MEF increase of approximately 18 percent with the increase in the slope.…”
Section: Preservation Of Mechanical Effective Forcementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the participants may have been less comfortable with propelling and training in a wheelchair that was not theirs. The different geometry of the simulator wheelchair might also have affected the participants' MEF production and improvement abilities [33]. Lastly, in (2), we used an approximation based on the moment about the wheel hub (M z ) to calculate the MEF both during the training session on the simulator and during analysis.…”
Section: A Recommendations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%