2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12647-018-0269-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Automation on GRR in Tactile Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of a work using the graphical outputs of Minitab software is [14], in which the authors evaluated and compared the variability of measurements between a manual instrument of measurement and a laser instrument during aircraft production processes. Another example of the use of these standard graphical outputs is [15], where Gage R&R analysis was used to compare two methods of measurement performed on a coordinate measurement machine. Numerical and graphical outputs confirmed that measurement in automatic (programmable) mode produces better results than measurement in manual mode.…”
Section: Proposal Of Graphical Tools For Effective Gage Randr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a work using the graphical outputs of Minitab software is [14], in which the authors evaluated and compared the variability of measurements between a manual instrument of measurement and a laser instrument during aircraft production processes. Another example of the use of these standard graphical outputs is [15], where Gage R&R analysis was used to compare two methods of measurement performed on a coordinate measurement machine. Numerical and graphical outputs confirmed that measurement in automatic (programmable) mode produces better results than measurement in manual mode.…”
Section: Proposal Of Graphical Tools For Effective Gage Randr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%