2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of augmented plantarflexion power on preferred walking speed and economy in young and older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
91
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(37 reference statements)
5
91
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering aging, it is known that force production capacity declines and movements become slower (Candow and Chilibeck, Lanza et al 2003;Norris et al 2007). Part of these changes are due to the aging process itself and part is due to a decrease in physical activity level, especially exercises that include rapid force production (Candow and Chilibeck.…”
Section: Why Should the Elderly Perform Hopping Training?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When considering aging, it is known that force production capacity declines and movements become slower (Candow and Chilibeck, Lanza et al 2003;Norris et al 2007). Part of these changes are due to the aging process itself and part is due to a decrease in physical activity level, especially exercises that include rapid force production (Candow and Chilibeck.…”
Section: Why Should the Elderly Perform Hopping Training?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the movements in elderly can be characterized as weak (Candow and Chilibeck. 2005;Norris et al 2007), slow (Lanza et al 2003;Norris et al 2007) and less economical (Malatesta et al 2003;Mian et al 2006) when compared to those of the young. Part of these changes are due to the aging process itself (Pearson et al 2002) but may be partly explained by the decrease in physical activity level that typically occurs with aging (Hunter et al 2000), especially high intensity exercises that require rapid force production (Candow and Chilibeck 2005;Morse et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While most research is focused on technical enhancements, a quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness is often missing (Dollar and Herr 2008). The metabolic energy expenditure, often calculated as metabolic power (W•kg -1 ) based on oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide using a standard equation (Brockway 1987) and body weight normalization, is a key value in the evaluation of several exoskeleton devices (Galle et al 2013a;Malcolm et al 2013;Mooney et al 2014;Norris et al 2007a;Sawicki and Ferris 2008, 2009a, 2009bWehner et al 2013). Regardless of the functional goal of the device, reducing the metabolic power will improve the usability of the exoskeleton (Ferris et al 2007) and can therefore be considered a prime outcome when evaluating exoskeleton effectiveness, that can even be used to drive kinematic behavior with exoskeletons (Collins and Jackson 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walking with powered exoskeletons with pneumatic muscles that assist plantarflexion during push-off results in reductions in metabolic power of 10 to 17% compared to walking with an unpowered exoskeleton (without plantarflexion assistance) (Galle et al 2013a;Malcolm et al 2013;Norris et al 2007a; Sawicki and Ferris 2008, 2009a, 2009b. Despite the increased weight of the device, Malcolm et al (2013) were the first to report a 6% reduction in metabolic power for powered exoskeleton walking compared to walking with normal shoes if the actuation timing of the exoskeleton was optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation