2003
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200309001-00097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Arsenic Mitigation Interventions on Disease Burden in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For internal cancers, the calculated annual Asattributable deaths and DALYs reported per 100,000 population here are broadly comparable with those published recently for Bangladesh by Yu et al (2003) and Lokuge et al (2004). Differences in rates reflect, in part, differences in the choice of dose-response models and the rendering of the risk assessment models, but also, in part, differences in exposure, background rates and susceptibilities between the two populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For internal cancers, the calculated annual Asattributable deaths and DALYs reported per 100,000 population here are broadly comparable with those published recently for Bangladesh by Yu et al (2003) and Lokuge et al (2004). Differences in rates reflect, in part, differences in the choice of dose-response models and the rendering of the risk assessment models, but also, in part, differences in exposure, background rates and susceptibilities between the two populations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The skin cancer deaths were calculated from their prevalence data assuming exposure for 20 y and case fatality rates of 14.3%(Lokuge et al, 2004) 2 DALY is estimated only as product of total mortality and YLL (years of life lost) and no YLD (years of life lost due to disability is considered) 3 Hyperpigmentation and keratosis, DALY estimate based on YLD (years of life lost due to disability) only with prevalence multiplied by severity weighting fromFewtrell et al (2005) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55,440 Each of these methods may have utility in a given context; however, none is universally available or effective at providing safe water, and risks inherent with the alternative methods must be compared against potential benefits. 441 Even where applicable, water from alternative sources must still be tested to ensure that levels of biological pathogens, 440 multiple metal contaminants, 442 and carcinogenic by-products from treatment 443 meet established drinking water guidelines. It should be noted that surface water may be additionally contaminated by arsenic-containing irrigation run-off, 21a,442b,444 and while deeper wells in Bangladesh and Vietnam may have less arsenic, 21a,444,445 deeper wells in China may have more arsenic.…”
Section: Mitigation Of Contaminated Groundwater Alternative Sources O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home treatment systems must also be regularly monitored for bacteriological contamination, particularly in the developing world where chances of such contamination are high. 441 An additional concern with home-scale systems is the problem of toxic sludge disposal once the adsorbents have exceeded their utility; it is essential that proper disposal solutions be made, developed and put in place before home-scale treatment systems are adopted for widespread use.…”
Section: Drinking Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…likelihood of 2 million cases of arsenicosis, including 125 000 cancers, and there are already 9000 arsenic-related deaths a year (Lokuge et al, 2004). Ahsan (2000) estimates a probable 3 million cases of arsenicosis over a thirty year period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%