2019
DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i1e.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of aquatic therapy v/s relaxation therapy in chronic low back pain

Abstract: Low back pain is a commonest condition in today's world. There are varieties of treatments used in management of low back pain. Among them, aquatic exercises are given because of unique properties of Water. By utilizing unique properties of water like buoyancy, resistance, flow and turbulence, exercise program is made. Buoyancy gives weightlessness which allows greater range of movement in the joint. Aquatic therapy decreases axial loading of the spine and buoyancy helps in the movement of the spine. Second is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After removing duplicates ( n = 20), the remaining studies were reviewed according to the title and the abstract, and then 807 studies were removed, leaving 29 full-text articles. Fifteen other studies were omitted because of the following reasons: (a) no control group (Bello et al, 2010; Cuesta-Vargas et al, 2011; Kanitz et al, 2021; Pires et al, 2015; Rezai et al, 2020); (b) lack of access to data (Johnson et al, 2016; McIlveen & Robertson, 1998); (c) study with a different population (Granath et al, 2006); and (d) studies with an active control group (Carvalho et al, 2020; Costantino & Romiti, 2014; Dundar et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2022; Prabhu & Dadmi, 2019; Ragia et al, 2021; Yozbatiran et al, 2004). Fourteen studies (Alikhajeh et al, 2020; Ansari et al, 2021; Baena-Beato et al, 2013, 2014; Cuesta-Vargas et al, 2012b; Han et al, 2011; Hossein Abadi et al, 2019b; Irandoust & Taheri, 2015; Janyacharoen et al, 2012; Keane, 2017; Khodaveisi et al, 2018; Mirmoezzi et al, 2021; Najafi Ghagholestani et al, 2022; Taheri & Irandoust, 2014) met our inclusion criteria and were entered in the meta-analysis (Table 1 and PRISMA flow diagram, shown in Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing duplicates ( n = 20), the remaining studies were reviewed according to the title and the abstract, and then 807 studies were removed, leaving 29 full-text articles. Fifteen other studies were omitted because of the following reasons: (a) no control group (Bello et al, 2010; Cuesta-Vargas et al, 2011; Kanitz et al, 2021; Pires et al, 2015; Rezai et al, 2020); (b) lack of access to data (Johnson et al, 2016; McIlveen & Robertson, 1998); (c) study with a different population (Granath et al, 2006); and (d) studies with an active control group (Carvalho et al, 2020; Costantino & Romiti, 2014; Dundar et al, 2009; Peng et al, 2022; Prabhu & Dadmi, 2019; Ragia et al, 2021; Yozbatiran et al, 2004). Fourteen studies (Alikhajeh et al, 2020; Ansari et al, 2021; Baena-Beato et al, 2013, 2014; Cuesta-Vargas et al, 2012b; Han et al, 2011; Hossein Abadi et al, 2019b; Irandoust & Taheri, 2015; Janyacharoen et al, 2012; Keane, 2017; Khodaveisi et al, 2018; Mirmoezzi et al, 2021; Najafi Ghagholestani et al, 2022; Taheri & Irandoust, 2014) met our inclusion criteria and were entered in the meta-analysis (Table 1 and PRISMA flow diagram, shown in Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%