Effect of Applying tDCS by Inactive Electrode Placement to Cognitive Response on Stroke Patients

Hwang, Ki-Kyeong; Lee, Jeong-Woo

doi:10.5627/kace.2013.6.1.031

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hwang and Lee 10 ) reported that tDCS delivered by carbon rubber electrodes to stroke patients’ primary motor cortex resulted in shorter P300 latency at both the Fp1 and 2 areas. Their result is similar to the result our present study, which used healthy people as subjects.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of the Electrode Type on N100 and P300 in tDCS Applications

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[Purpose] This study investigated the effects of types of electrode on N100 and P300 in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applications. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty subjects were randomly assigned to two groups with 15 subjects in each group depending on the electrode types. A positive electrode on the primary motor area (C4) and a negative electrode on the left primary motor area (C3), and stimulation was applied for 20 minutes. Before and after tDCS, N100 and P300 were measured by attaching an electrode to Fp1 and Fp2. [Results] In tDCS applications, N100 and P300 showed no significant interaction effects between time and group for either latency or amplitude in the Fp1 and Fp 2 areas, but there was a statistically significant difference in the main effect duration. [Conclusion] The latencies of N100 and P300 were shortened and that their amplitudes increased in both the Fp1 and Fp2 areas, regardless of the type of electrode.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of the Electrode Type on N100 and P300 in tDCS Applications

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Park 8 ) report GVS has a good effect on cognition related to event-related potential. Furthermore, some studies report tDCS not only enhances exercise function, but also positively affects cognitive reaction 9 ) . However, few studies report similar findings with GVS.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on movement-related cortical potential

Lee

2015

J Phys Ther Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[Purpose] This study examined the effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on motion-related cortical potential. [Subjects and Methods] Fourty healthy female adult subjects each received galvanic vestibular stimulation or sham treatment. For galvanic vestibular stimulation, the anode and cathode were applied to the right and left mastoid processes, respectively, for 10 minutes. Motion-related cortical potential was tested pre- and post-treatment. To measure motion-related cortical potential, surface electromyography signals were generated by 50 thumb abductions with electrode application on the abductor pollicis brevis of the left (i.e., non-dominant) hand. [Results] The negative slope cortical potential on the C3 area (i.e., dominant hand) and cortical negative slope and motor potential on the C4 area (i.e., non-dominant hand) showed significant interaction effects. The galvanic vestibular stimulation group showed an increased negative slope amplitude in the C3 area, and increased negative slope and motor potential amplitudes in the C4 area compared to the sham group. [Conclusion] Galvanic vestibular stimulation increases the negative slope and motor potential amplitudes of the homonymous brain cortex area, which controls hand function and motion-related cortical potential, and the negative slope amplitude of the opposite cortical area, thus activating the brain areas for hand function.

show abstract

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Agility of Normal Adults: A Pilot Study

Koh¹,

Doo²,

Lee³

2018

J Health Info Stat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to examine effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on leg agility of normal adults. Methods: Subjects were 18 healthy male adults in their 20s, and they were distributed into them group (9) and tDCS application group (9). The tDCS was applied in 0.083 mA/cm 2 intensity for 15 minutes, and stimulating current during application was interrupted DC, with pulse duration of 2 msec, and interpulse interval duration of 5 msec. agility were measured through Burpee test and Sidestep test before and after tDCS application. Results: The reaction time in muscle contraction showed significant differences interaction effects between group and time in rectus femoris, tibialis anterior, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius muscles. Burpee and sidestep tests all showed significant differences interaction effects between group and time. Conclusions: The reaction time of muscle contraction after tDCS was reduced in all muscle. The numbers of sidestep and Bupee test after tDCS were increased. Therefore, the results of this study suggest that tDCS application might help increase lower limb agility.

show abstract

Effect of Applying tDCS by Inactive Electrode Placement to Cognitive Response on Stroke Patients

Cited by 3 publications

References 23 publications

Effects of the Electrode Type on N100 and P300 in tDCS Applications

Effects of the Electrode Type on N100 and P300 in tDCS Applications

Effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on movement-related cortical potential

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Leg Agility of Normal Adults: A Pilot Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About