2013
DOI: 10.7455/ijfs/2.1.2013.a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of antioxidant and optimal antimicrobial mixtures of carvacrol, grape seed extract and chitosan on different spoilage microorganisms and their application as coatings on different food matrices

Abstract: There is growing interest in the use of natural agents with antimicrobial (AM) and antioxidant (AOX) properties. Optimization of the AM capacity for mixtures containing carvacrol, grape seed extract (GSE) and chitosan, against gram-negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa), gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua and Enterococcus faecalis) and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) at 10 6 cfu mL −1 was studied. To observe the synergistic or antagonistic effect and find optimal combinations between t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(61 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CS films could have greater flexibility due to the presence of β‐(1‐4) D glucosamine linkages that were not found in CMC (Shingel, ). The E values for CS were similar to 28% given by Rubilar (), but in both studies these values were higher than 17% found by Vargas, Albors, Chiralt and González‐Martínez (). Differences are attributed to differences in CS powder source with variations in deacetylation degree, natural impurities, type, and content of plasticizer (Rubilar, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CS films could have greater flexibility due to the presence of β‐(1‐4) D glucosamine linkages that were not found in CMC (Shingel, ). The E values for CS were similar to 28% given by Rubilar (), but in both studies these values were higher than 17% found by Vargas, Albors, Chiralt and González‐Martínez (). Differences are attributed to differences in CS powder source with variations in deacetylation degree, natural impurities, type, and content of plasticizer (Rubilar, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The E values for CS were similar to 28% given by Rubilar (), but in both studies these values were higher than 17% found by Vargas, Albors, Chiralt and González‐Martínez (). Differences are attributed to differences in CS powder source with variations in deacetylation degree, natural impurities, type, and content of plasticizer (Rubilar, ). Control CMC films had similar E as previously reported (Tong, Xiao, & Lim, ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, after the chitosan solution was homogenized with glycerol and Tween-80, the AM agents were added and mixed using an Ultra-Turrax (Ika-Werke, model T25, Germany) at 9500 rpm for 5 min, according to the desired final concentration (Table 1) in each film. Based on the previous studies [8,16], three optimal concentrations were prepared using a simple centroid mixture design between carvacrol, GSE and chitosan, as shown in Table 1. After cooling to room temperature, the solutions were degassed at 6 68 kPa (Edwards, BS 2208, UK) for 5 min and then 200 mL (for each film) were cast onto 32 cm round glass plates, and dried at 25 ºC for 48 h. Each film was then stored in desiccators at 25 ºC and 57% relative humidity, using a NaBr (02119, Sigma Aldrich, Portugal) saturated solution until testing.…”
Section: Preparation Of Chitosan Films By Casting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chitosan, a natural polymer obtained by deacetylation of chitin, has been widely used to produce biodegradable films [8,15,16] with several recent reviews on chitosan-based films available [17][18][19]. The AM and/or AOX properties of such films may be improved by adding different natural compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation