1995
DOI: 10.1016/0032-9592(94)00029-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of antifoam agents on the medium and microbial cell properties and process performance in small and large reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved antifoam efficiency will contribute to fermentation productivity and will ease downstream processing. Improved longevity of antifoam may reduce the need for repeated dosing of antifoam often needed during the later stages of fermentation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved antifoam efficiency will contribute to fermentation productivity and will ease downstream processing. Improved longevity of antifoam may reduce the need for repeated dosing of antifoam often needed during the later stages of fermentation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to operate bioreactors with an excess headspace and to suppress foam by the addition of chemical antifoams. This raises the costs of the bioprocess and lowers the productivity of the system due to reduced oxygen‐transfer rates and possible adverse effects on cell physiology 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, a decrease of biomass concentration has been observed after 32 h and can be related to the removal of microbial cells from the medium and their accumulation in the foam phase. As stated above, it is generally recognized that physical defoaming methods are more suited because they do not modify the physicochemical properties of the broth [18]. This is not entirely true in the case of intensive foaming because the distance between the liquid surface and the foamdisk leads to the formation of a persistent layer of foam (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%