2005
DOI: 10.1128/aac.49.8.3529-3532.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Antibiotic Treatment on Growth of and Toxin Production by Clostridium difficile in the Cecal Contents of Mice

Abstract: In mice, subcutaneous administration of antibiotics that disrupt the anaerobic microflora (i.e., clindamycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftriaxone) facilitated in vitro growth of and toxin production by Clostridium difficile in cecal contents, whereas antibiotics that cause minimal disruption of the anaerobic microflora (i.e., levofloxacin, cefepime, and aztreonam) did not

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
75
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the clinical observation that the risk of subsequent CDI differs with different antibiotics 33 and in vitro and animal studies that also differentiate antibiotics on the basis of their ability to overcome colonization resistance against C. difficile. 31,34,35 Taken together these results suggest that this murine infection model accurately represents competition between two Enterococcus. 41 However, in our animals we did not find a direct relationship between changes in RegIIIγ expression following antibiotic treatment and colonization resistance to C. difficile (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the clinical observation that the risk of subsequent CDI differs with different antibiotics 33 and in vitro and animal studies that also differentiate antibiotics on the basis of their ability to overcome colonization resistance against C. difficile. 31,34,35 Taken together these results suggest that this murine infection model accurately represents competition between two Enterococcus. 41 However, in our animals we did not find a direct relationship between changes in RegIIIγ expression following antibiotic treatment and colonization resistance to C. difficile (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…15 In rare cases where normal individuals are colonized by C. difficile without overt clinical disease, it is further hypothesized that the normal indigenous microbiota can at least limit the production of toxin, perhaps by directly interfering with toxin production or limiting the population size of C. difficile and preventing significant amounts of toxin from accumulating in the gut. 15,31 Accordingly, disruption of the indigenous microbiota by antibiotics leads to a loss of colonization resistance, making the gut vulnerable to colonization by exogenous C. difficile spores or, in previously colonized patients, expansion and toxin production. In support of this concept, Wilson and colleagues provided evidence for the ability of the normal gut microbiota to inhibit C. difficile by demonstrating that administration of normal cecal homogenates would decrease the number of viable C. difficile and prevent colitis in antibioticchallenged hamsters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a mouse model, we previously demonstrated that antibiotics that disrupt the anaerobic microflora (e.g., clindamycin and ceftriaxone) promoted in vitro growth of (Ն2-log increase in density after inoculation of 4 log 10 CFU/ml) and toxin production by nonepidemic C. difficile isolates in cecal contents, whereas antibiotics that cause minimal disruption of the anaerobic microflora, including levofloxacin, did not (Ն1-log decrease in density) (12). Piperacillin-tazobactam, an agent with inhibitory activity against many C. difficile isolates, suppressed the organism during treatment, but overgrowth and toxin production were promoted if exposure occurred after treatment during the period of recovery of the indigenous microflora (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is the variation of C. difficile counts in vivo, as these correlated with fecal toxin levels in mice (31) and were on average 100-fold higher in CDAD patients than in asymptomatic C. difficile carriers (24). However, although broth cultures of individual isolates generated similar and reproducible optical densities and bacterial counts, we could not reliably determine C. difficile counts in feces using the selective medium TCCFA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDAD is associated mainly with the use of antibiotics that reduce the protective microflora, which allows for overgrowth and toxin production by C. difficile (21), and chemostat and animal studies have verified that certain antibiotics induce C. difficile growth, toxin production, and toxin release (11,29,31). Furthermore, the age of the patient, underlying diseases, and levels of toxin-neutralizing antibodies are factors that affect attack rate, severity of disease, and the risk of relapse of CDAD (17,18,21,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%