2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration-to-birth interval on maternal and newborn outcomes: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, our findings did not come in line with McDougall et al (16) systematic review, which studied ten trials (4592 mothers; 5018 newborns), 45 cohort research (at least 22,992 females; 30,974 newborns) and two case-control studies (355 mother; 360 babies) and found an optimal administration of ACS to-birth interval, however this interval wasn't identified due to variations in study design.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Current Findings And Comparison To Sim...contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, our findings did not come in line with McDougall et al (16) systematic review, which studied ten trials (4592 mothers; 5018 newborns), 45 cohort research (at least 22,992 females; 30,974 newborns) and two case-control studies (355 mother; 360 babies) and found an optimal administration of ACS to-birth interval, however this interval wasn't identified due to variations in study design.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Current Findings And Comparison To Sim...contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Although the interval from administration of antenatal corticosteroids to delivery was outside the scope of our research question, a recent systematic review examining such intervals was unable to determine the optimal timing. 76 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the interval from administration of antenatal corticosteroids to delivery was outside the scope of our research question, a recent systematic review examining such intervals was unable to determine the optimal timing. 76 unanswered questions and future research Further research with long term follow-up in randomised controlled trials will be critical for term or late preterm infants, and in the meantime potentially for children outside of randomised controlled trials. One study involving teacher assessment of children aged 12 years of a parent who had been randomised to antenatal corticosteroids at term gestation, found a doubling of the risk of being in the lower quartile of academic ability compared with children whose parent received placebo (8.5% v 17.7%, P=0.03).…”
Section: Meaning Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They confer benefits by crossing the placenta and accelerating structural maturation of fetal lung tissue and other organs.5,6 The 2020 update of the Cochrane review on ACS efficacy found that ACS use significantly reduces the risk of moderate/severe respiratory distress, perinatal death and neonatal death, and probably reduces the risk of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) and developmental delay in childhood.7 WHO currently recommends that ACS should be administered to women between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation who are at risk of imminent preterm birth, provided that certain criteria related to a minimum level of maternal and preterm newborn care can be met. 14,15…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%