2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2005.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of annealing on the structure and physicochemical properties of barley starches of varying amylose content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
141
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
21
141
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was in range (20 to 30%) found by Tester et al [31] and Waduge et al [32]. In relation to the starch group, yam belongs to the group with moderate to high amylose content [9], [33].…”
Section: B Chemical Compoundsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This result was in range (20 to 30%) found by Tester et al [31] and Waduge et al [32]. In relation to the starch group, yam belongs to the group with moderate to high amylose content [9], [33].…”
Section: B Chemical Compoundsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…These observations might be attributed to the rearrangement of starch molecules and the limitation in starch hydration (Hoover & Manuel, 1996a;Waduge et al, 2006). The rigid structure consisting of ordered double helical amylopectin side chain clusters induced the low swelling power of HMT starches (Li, Ward, & Gao, 2011).…”
Section: Swelling Power and Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMT can efficiently improve thermal stability, increase gelatinization temperature and decrease swelling power of starches (Gunaratne & Hoover, 2002;Olayinka, Adebowale, & Olu-Owolabi, 2008;Watcharatewinkul, Puttanlek, Rungsardthong, & Uttapap, 2009). While ANN can significantly improve the formation of resistant starch , increase relative crystallinity (RC) and gelatinization temperature (Lan et al, 2008;Waduge, Hoover, Vasanthan, Gao, & Li, 2006), and decrease peak viscosity and swelling power (Gomes, da Silva, Ricardo, Sasaki, & Germani, 2004). Thus, both ANN and HMT are effective and safe methods to improve the properties of starches which are desirable for noodle, dough, bread and canned food manufacture (Zavareze & Dias, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annealing and pressure treatment are two important techniques to modify the microstructure and physicochemical properties of starch. [1][2][3][4][5] Previous studies have shown that the gelatinization behaviors of starches were significantly affected by these two kinds of treatments. Pressure treatment generally facilitates gelatinization processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A polymorphic structure change from 'A+B' type to 'A' type during annealing has been found in sweet potato and barley starch. 2,27 Waduge et al 2 observed an increase in relative crystallinity (RC) of waxy and normal starches but an unchanged RC for the high amylose starches, using a barley family of varying amylose content (up to 50%). On the other hand, pressured gelatinization is significantly different from the traditional gelatinization, 1,28 as the pressure treatment could cause an irreversible distortion of the crystalline region in starch granules prior to a reversible hydration of the amorphous phase, which in turn leads to the destruction of the granule structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%