2011
DOI: 10.1136/emj.2010.104034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an onboard event recorder and a formal review process on ambulance driving behaviour

Abstract: The institution of video event recorder technology along with formal review and feedback resulted in a change in driving behaviour. Given that call volumes increased and driving events decreased, these measures may serve as surrogates for improvements in safety and maintenance costs. Economic analysis is necessary for conclusions on fiscal impact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the safety effect is comparable to those in similar studies of truck (Hickman et al, 2009) and ambulance drivers (Myers et al, 2012) but not as high as that reported in a study of teenage drivers using DriveCam feedback over a similar time period (57%-83%; Carney et al, 2010;McGehee et al, 2007McGehee et al, , 2008. Benefits of the intervention appeared to be sustained for up to 3 mo, despite the participants' memory impairment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The magnitude of the safety effect is comparable to those in similar studies of truck (Hickman et al, 2009) and ambulance drivers (Myers et al, 2012) but not as high as that reported in a study of teenage drivers using DriveCam feedback over a similar time period (57%-83%; Carney et al, 2010;McGehee et al, 2007McGehee et al, , 2008. Benefits of the intervention appeared to be sustained for up to 3 mo, despite the participants' memory impairment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A single unsafe driving event could have more than one demerit category, such as judgment error combined with poor awareness of an intersection, leading to a combined driving severity rating score for the individual event. The severity rating scores derived and reported by DriveCam experts were previously used in a longitudinal study of ambulance drivers to demonstrate reduction in not only numbers of events but also severity scores for events (Myers et al, 2012). The primary quantitative outcomes from these ratings for our study were total number of unsafe driving events (events scored >5 points) per 1,000 miles driven and total unsafe driving event severity score per 1,000 miles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original scoring system was developed by a commercial driving evaluation system, DriveCam ® . This method has been previously used to characterize and monitor driving in a longitudinal study of ambulance drivers [ 20 ]. Unsafe driving events were rated according to eight major categories of concern: distractions, poor awareness, driver conduct, fundamentals, following too close, driver condition, traffic violations, and other concerns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 Myers et al evaluated the effect of a drivingevent monitoring system with a formal review and feedback loop in 54 rural and urban communities in Wisconsin and Minnesota. 61 Over a two-year period, events decreased significantly in these EMS agencies.…”
Section: Host Factor Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%