2012
DOI: 10.1177/0733464812440042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an Interdisciplinary Educational Program on Antipsychotic Prescribing Among Residents With Dementia in Two Long-Term Care Centers

Abstract: The effect of an educational program on antipsychotic prescribing was assessed in two Canadian long-term care centers (LTCC). In each center (Center A residents, n = 258 and Center B residents, n = 191, with dementia at program inception), the rate of change in the odds of using antipsychotics in residents was estimated using mixed-effects logistic regression during a 6-month program period and a 4-month postprogram period, with baseline proportions of use estimated during the 6 months prior to the program. Pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multidisciplinary Medication Reviews or Interdisciplinary Ward Rounds ("Team Rounds") Such programs have been shown to decrease inappropriate medication use among nursing home residents, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] particularly for patients whose medication loads have increased over time 25 and those transitioning to nursing homes. 26 We developed a guideline for conducting Team Rounds, the English version of which is available in Supplementary Appendix S1.…”
Section: Tool Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multidisciplinary Medication Reviews or Interdisciplinary Ward Rounds ("Team Rounds") Such programs have been shown to decrease inappropriate medication use among nursing home residents, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] particularly for patients whose medication loads have increased over time 25 and those transitioning to nursing homes. 26 We developed a guideline for conducting Team Rounds, the English version of which is available in Supplementary Appendix S1.…”
Section: Tool Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed similar trends to those seen in studies of a more robust design. These are smaller single 30e32 or 2-center studies 29 involving between 53 and 300 patients and their associated care staff. The interventions resulted in a decrease in antipsychotic use (variously reported) in 3 studies.…”
Section: Medication Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detail is sparse because these follow-up visits were outside of the formal trial period, but it is likely that the extent to which procedures used during the study continued to be used varied between sites both within the same trial and between trials. For example, Monette and colleagues 29 commented that although staff at the long-term care centers had expressed an intention to adopt some of the program components, none were systematically adopted after the study. In contrast, Rovner and colleagues 39 attribute the maintenance of the effect of the intervention in their study to an ongoing requirement for physicians to complete an "indications and side effects" document for each resident receiving psychoactive medication.…”
Section: /44 Withdrawn [I] 7/59 Withdrawn [C]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that psychiatrists in England felt under pressure to prescribe for PWD experiencing behavioural and psychological symptoms and did not always adopt an evidence-based approach to prescribing activity [13]. Whilst a number of studies have reported on appropriateness of prescribing for PWD, these tend to focus on dementia patients living in long-term care facilities [16,17], those at the end of life [18,19], or those prescribed antipsychotic medications [20,21]. Less attention has been paid to PWD living in their own homes within the primary healthcare setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%