2017
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.10169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: IMPORTANCEIt is unclear whether a lifestyle intervention can maintain glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE To test whether an intensive lifestyle intervention results in equivalent glycemic control compared with standard care and, secondarily, leads to a reduction in glucose-lowering medication in participants with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, assessor-blinded, single-center study within Region Zealand and the Capital Region of Denmark (April 2015-Augus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
159
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
159
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Weight loss was greater in a subgroup of participants who attended all scheduled clinic visits with the study dietitian compared with participants who missed sessions. The benefits of behavioral support, 21 specifically support provided by a dietitian, 22 as well as the effects of lifestyle interventions, 23 are noted in the literature. There was a significant difference in loss of total fat-free mass, which was greater in the intermittent energy restriction group for completers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight loss was greater in a subgroup of participants who attended all scheduled clinic visits with the study dietitian compared with participants who missed sessions. The benefits of behavioral support, 21 specifically support provided by a dietitian, 22 as well as the effects of lifestyle interventions, 23 are noted in the literature. There was a significant difference in loss of total fat-free mass, which was greater in the intermittent energy restriction group for completers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is evidence supporting the benefits of CT for improving glucose control in T2DM patients, there is yet no clear indication of the ability of this exercise modality to combat T2DM‐associated comorbidities as the metabolic syndrome markers. A 12‐month lifestyle intervention for T2DM patients that included exercise training (5‐6 ET sessions of 30‐60 minutes duration plus 2‐3 RT sessions per week) and diet decreased fasting glucose (−7.8 mg/dL on average) and changed several other parameters, such as abdominal fat (−0.81 kg), lean mass (+0.62 kg), SBP/DBP (−1.5/−1.4 mm Hg), triglycerides (−8.4 mg/dL), and VO 2peak (+14.5%). Along this line, after an 8‐week CT intervention for T2DM patients (60 minutes/session, including ET (cycling/treadmill) plus RT at 55%‐85% of 1RM), Maiorana et al found decreases in fasting glucose (−40 mg/dL on average), resting heart rate (−4 beats/min), waist‐to‐hip ratio (−1.3%), and fat mass (−0.8%), but no changes in lipid profile or blood pressure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present extension study was designed as a pragmatic superiority study based on follow‐up assessment of the participants in a recent single‐centre clinical trial (Appendix S1), conducted in the Capital Region of Denmark from 29 April 2015 to 17 August 2017 and including 98 participants. The primary outcome was assessed after a 12‐month intervention and published previously . The data for the present extension study were based on the follow‐up examinations 12 months after the primary outcome assessment (ie, 24 months from the baseline assessments).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%